PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCNTX vs. FPHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCNTX vs. FPHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) and Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio (FPHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNTX achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly lower than FPHAX's 10.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FCNTX has outperformed FPHAX with an annualized return of 17.20%, while FPHAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.73% annualized return.


FCNTX

1D
-2.98%
1M
0.19%
YTD
6.03%
6M
6.20%
1Y
19.84%
3Y*
26.22%
5Y*
14.50%
10Y*
17.20%

FPHAX

1D
-0.78%
1M
6.37%
YTD
10.17%
6M
11.79%
1Y
40.05%
3Y*
17.98%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
11.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCNTX vs. FPHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
6.03%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%
FPHAX
Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio
10.17%30.41%9.39%12.54%0.94%11.79%11.16%31.73%5.41%10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FCNTX and FPHAX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2001

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between FCNTX and FPHAX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCNTX vs. FPHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FPHAX
FPHAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FPHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FPHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCNTX vs. FPHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) and Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio (FPHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCNTXFPHAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

4.09

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

10.66

-2.66

FCNTX vs. FPHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the FPHAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNTX and FPHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCNTXFPHAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.08

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.75

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.66

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.55

+0.23

Drawdowns

FCNTX vs. FPHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNTX drawdown since its inception was -49.19%, which is greater than FPHAX's maximum drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNTX and FPHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCNTXFPHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.19%

-38.26%

-10.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-10.33%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.75%

-28.82%

+9.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.59%

-28.82%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.59%

-28.82%

-3.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-0.78%

-2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-9.17%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

3.96%

-1.30%

Volatility

FCNTX vs. FPHAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) is 4.35%, while Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio (FPHAX) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that FCNTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCNTXFPHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

5.71%

-1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.93%

14.25%

-3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.35%

20.30%

-5.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.19%

18.07%

+1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.70%

17.88%

+1.82%

FCNTX vs. FPHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNTX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FPHAX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCNTX vs. FPHAX - Dividend Comparison

FCNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than FPHAX's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.40%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FPHAX
Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio
5.05%5.68%1.90%8.08%5.18%11.09%8.85%8.33%1.65%1.62%1.07%12.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCNTX and FPHAX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPHAX has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to FCNTX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNTX dropped -49.19% vs FPHAX's -38.26%.

FPHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCNTX and FPHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer