PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCNTX vs. FOCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCNTX vs. FOCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNTX achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly lower than FOCKX's 27.65% return. Over the past 10 years, FCNTX has underperformed FOCKX with an annualized return of 17.43%, while FOCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.74% annualized return.


FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%

FOCKX

1D
0.76%
1M
10.65%
YTD
27.65%
6M
28.76%
1Y
62.04%
3Y*
34.92%
5Y*
19.63%
10Y*
22.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCNTX vs. FOCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%
FOCKX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K
27.65%22.28%38.91%42.92%-32.07%25.06%46.83%39.36%-3.18%38.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FCNTX and FOCKX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2008

0.94

The correlation between FCNTX and FOCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCNTX vs. FOCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCKX
FOCKX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FOCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCNTX vs. FOCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCNTXFOCKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

3.56

-1.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

4.41

-2.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.59

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

5.61

-3.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.04

24.83

-15.79

FCNTX vs. FOCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the FOCKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNTX and FOCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCNTXFOCKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

3.56

-1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.87

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

1.02

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.74

+0.04

Drawdowns

FCNTX vs. FOCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNTX drawdown since its inception was -49.19%, smaller than the maximum FOCKX drawdown of -53.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNTX and FOCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCNTXFOCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.19%

-53.33%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-11.28%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.75%

-24.83%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.59%

-36.97%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.59%

-36.97%

+4.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

0.00%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-8.38%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.54%

+0.11%

Volatility

FCNTX vs. FOCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) is 3.26%, while Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that FCNTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCNTXFOCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

5.39%

-2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.48%

13.94%

-3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.03%

17.79%

-3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.15%

22.68%

-3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

22.46%

-2.78%

FCNTX vs. FOCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNTX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FOCKX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCNTX vs. FOCKX - Dividend Comparison

FCNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, less than FOCKX's 5.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FOCKX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K
5.92%7.56%16.42%0.09%3.97%11.34%6.18%7.49%7.81%4.85%3.25%5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCNTX and FOCKX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOCKX has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to FCNTX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNTX dropped -49.19% vs FOCKX's -53.33%.

FOCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCNTX and FOCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer