PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCNTX vs. DJIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCNTX vs. DJIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) and Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNTX achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly higher than DJIA's 3.46% return.


FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%

DJIA

1D
0.02%
1M
3.32%
YTD
3.46%
6M
3.90%
1Y
14.53%
3Y*
10.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCNTX vs. DJIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-16.35%
DJIA
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
3.46%9.11%14.52%9.15%-2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FCNTX and DJIA is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.58

The correlation between FCNTX and DJIA shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCNTX vs. DJIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCNTX
DJIA

Technology

27.0%
17.1%

Communication Services

21.2%
1.9%

Financial Services

13.8%
27.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
11.6%

Healthcare

9.2%
13.1%

Industrials

8.6%
18.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
4.4%

Energy

3.6%
2.4%

Basic Materials

2.1%
4.0%

Utilities

0.5%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

FCNTX
27.0%
DJIA
17.1%

Communication Services

FCNTX
21.2%
DJIA
1.9%

Financial Services

FCNTX
13.8%
DJIA
27.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FCNTX
10.1%
DJIA
11.6%

Healthcare

FCNTX
9.2%
DJIA
13.1%

Industrials

FCNTX
8.6%
DJIA
18.4%

Consumer Defensive

FCNTX
3.7%
DJIA
4.4%

Energy

FCNTX
3.6%
DJIA
2.4%

Basic Materials

FCNTX
2.1%
DJIA
4.0%

Utilities

FCNTX
0.5%
DJIA

-

Real Estate

FCNTX
0.1%
DJIA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCNTX vs. DJIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

DJIA
DJIA Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DJIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJIA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DJIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJIA Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCNTX vs. DJIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) and Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCNTXDJIADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

1.89

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

2.67

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

1.99

+0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.04

7.38

+1.66

FCNTX vs. DJIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the DJIA Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNTX and DJIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCNTXDJIADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.89

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.69

+0.09

Drawdowns

FCNTX vs. DJIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNTX drawdown since its inception was -49.19%, which is greater than DJIA's maximum drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNTX and DJIA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCNTXDJIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.19%

-16.91%

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-7.34%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.75%

-12.09%

-7.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.13%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-3.59%

-4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

1.97%

+0.68%

Volatility

FCNTX vs. DJIA - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a higher volatility of 3.26% compared to Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) at 1.66%. This indicates that FCNTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DJIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCNTXDJIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

1.66%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.48%

6.24%

+4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.03%

7.74%

+6.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.15%

11.19%

+7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

11.19%

+8.49%

FCNTX vs. DJIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNTX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DJIA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCNTX vs. DJIA - Dividend Comparison

FCNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, less than DJIA's 10.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DJIA
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
10.82%10.60%11.44%7.16%9.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCNTX and DJIA have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to DJIA (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNTX dropped -49.19% vs DJIA's -16.91%.

DJIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCNTX and DJIA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer