FCNS.NEO vs. EGIF.TO
FCNS.NEO (Fidelity All-in-One Conservative ETF) and EGIF.TO (Exemplar Growth and Income Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FCNS.NEO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Fidelity, while EGIF.TO is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Capital Management Inc.. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FCNS.NEO returned 11.65% vs 24.49% for EGIF.TO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FCNS.NEO vs. EGIF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCNS.NEO achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly lower than EGIF.TO's 13.34% return.
FCNS.NEO
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 5.61%
- 1Y
- 11.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.36%
EGIF.TO
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 6.52%
- YTD
- 13.34%
- 1Y
- 24.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.08%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$4.65K | CA$4.45K | CA$8.44K | |
| CA$2.87M | CA$3.68M | CA$3.34M |
FCNS.NEO vs. EGIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FCNS.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Conservative ETF | 5.61% | 9.95% | 9.08% |
EGIF.TO Exemplar Growth and Income Fund | 13.34% | 15.83% | 11.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCNS.NEO and EGIF.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCNS.NEO vs. EGIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FCNS.NEO
EGIF.TO
FCNS.NEO vs. EGIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity All-in-One Conservative ETF (FCNS.NEO) and Exemplar Growth and Income Fund (EGIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCNS.NEO | EGIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 2.29 | -0.97 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 3.70 | -1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.35 | 15.18 | -5.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCNS.NEO vs. EGIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCNS.NEO drawdown since its inception was -6.45%, smaller than the maximum EGIF.TO drawdown of -15.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNS.NEO and EGIF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCNS.NEO | EGIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.45% | -15.10% | +8.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.85% | -6.68% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -6.61% | +5.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.89% | -3.44% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 1.62% | -0.37% |
Volatility
FCNS.NEO vs. EGIF.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity All-in-One Conservative ETF (FCNS.NEO) is 2.90%, while Exemplar Growth and Income Fund (EGIF.TO) has a volatility of 9.14%. This indicates that FCNS.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGIF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCNS.NEO | EGIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 9.14% | -6.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.82% | 10.75% | -4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.88% | 14.62% | -7.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.92% | 9.27% | -2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.92% | 9.09% | -2.17% |
Dividends
FCNS.NEO vs. EGIF.TO - Dividend Comparison
FCNS.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than EGIF.TO's 2.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGIF.TO Exemplar Growth and Income Fund | 2.93% | 3.27% | 3.66% | 4.27% | 4.57% | 2.66% | 2.86% | 2.89% | 0.75% |
FCNS.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Conservative ETF | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCNS.NEO and EGIF.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCNS.NEO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while EGIF.TO is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Arrow Capital Management Inc..
Find the right allocation for FCNS.NEO and EGIF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer