FCNKX vs. GSITX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCNKX (Fidelity Contrafund Fund) and GSITX (Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund) are both mutual funds - FCNKX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while GSITX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 10 years, FCNKX returned 17.89%/yr vs 13.24%/yr for GSITX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCNKX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for GSITX.

Performance

FCNKX vs. GSITX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund (GSITX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNKX achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly lower than GSITX's 19.26% return. Over the past 10 years, FCNKX has outperformed GSITX with an annualized return of 17.89%, while GSITX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.24% annualized return.

FCNKX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.67%
• YTD: 7.77%
• 6M: 10.08%
• 1Y: 23.81%
• 3Y*: 27.22%
• 5Y*: 15.58%
• 10Y*: 17.89%

GSITX

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 3.83%
• YTD: 19.26%
• 6M: 18.44%
• 1Y: 45.14%
• 3Y*: 26.13%
• 5Y*: 12.47%
• 10Y*: 13.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCNKX vs. GSITX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCNKX Fidelity Contrafund Fund	7.77%	21.88%	36.08%	39.50%	-27.44%	24.66%	32.50%	30.18%	-2.27%	32.20%
GSITX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund	19.26%	12.95%	29.64%	17.50%	-13.56%	33.22%	0.32%	23.52%	-10.69%	7.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FCNKX and GSITX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2008	0.74

The correlation between FCNKX and GSITX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCNKX vs. GSITX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNKX

FCNKX Risk / Return Rank: 36
FCNKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FCNKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FCNKX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FCNKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FCNKX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

GSITX

GSITX Risk / Return Rank: 80
GSITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GSITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
GSITX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
GSITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
GSITX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCNKX vs. GSITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund (GSITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCNKX	GSITX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.60	-0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	3.60	-1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.44	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	5.20	-3.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.09	18.26	-9.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCNKX vs. GSITX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the GSITX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNKX and GSITX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCNKX	GSITX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	2.60	-0.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	0.55	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	0.55	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.39	+0.28

Drawdowns

FCNKX vs. GSITX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNKX drawdown since its inception was -46.44%, smaller than the maximum GSITX drawdown of -56.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNKX and GSITX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCNKX	GSITX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.44%	-56.37%	+9.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.29%	-9.16%	-2.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.73%	-24.88%	+5.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.77%	-24.88%	-6.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.77%	-47.17%	+15.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	-0.00%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.31%	-8.85%	+1.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	2.60%	+0.06%

Volatility

FCNKX vs. GSITX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX) is 3.21%, while Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund (GSITX) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that FCNKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSITX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCNKX	GSITX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.21%	5.01%	-1.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.50%	12.15%	-1.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.05%	18.33%	-4.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.12%	22.67%	-3.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.65%	24.12%	-4.47%

FCNKX vs. GSITX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNKX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than GSITX's 0.84% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCNKX vs. GSITX - Dividend Comparison

FCNKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than GSITX's 4.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNKX Fidelity Contrafund Fund	4.31%	5.18%	4.28%	4.31%	13.69%	10.77%	8.00%	4.15%	9.14%	6.09%	3.92%	4.47%
GSITX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund	4.06%	4.84%	30.83%	1.37%	2.63%	26.49%	0.72%	0.71%	9.14%	9.11%	3.55%	5.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCNKX and GSITX in my portfolio?

FCNKX and GSITX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCNKX or GSITX?

GSITX has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to FCNKX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNKX dropped -46.44% vs GSITX's -56.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSITX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.