FCNKX vs. BLUEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX).
FCNKX is managed by Fidelity. BLUEX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jan 10, 1991.
Performance
FCNKX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCNKX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCNKX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | -5.37% | 21.88% | 36.08% | 39.50% | -27.44% | 24.66% | 32.50% | 30.18% | -2.27% | 32.20% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | -8.68% | 4.45% | 7.24% | 14.35% | -14.30% | 3.22% | 34.74% | 35.34% | -4.91% | 27.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCNKX achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly higher than BLUEX's -8.68% return. Over the past 10 years, FCNKX has outperformed BLUEX with an annualized return of 16.48%, while BLUEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.35% annualized return.
FCNKX
- 1D
- 3.50%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -2.55%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 25.20%
- 5Y*
- 13.66%
- 10Y*
- 16.48%
BLUEX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- -8.68%
- 6M
- -9.03%
- 1Y
- -7.28%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCNKX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCNKX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCNKX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank
FCNKX
BLUEX
FCNKX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCNKX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | -0.66 | +1.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | -0.89 | +2.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.89 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | -0.69 | +2.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.88 | -2.40 | +8.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCNKX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | -0.66 | +1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.05 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 | 0.57 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.49 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCNKX and BLUEX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCNKX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison
FCNKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than BLUEX's 0.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCNKX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | 4.91% | 5.18% | 4.28% | 4.31% | 13.69% | 10.77% | 8.00% | 4.15% | 9.14% | 6.09% | 3.92% | 4.47% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 0.03% | 11.84% | 27.20% | 25.43% | 13.71% | 13.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% |
Drawdowns
FCNKX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCNKX drawdown since its inception was -90.08%, which is greater than BLUEX's maximum drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNKX and BLUEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCNKX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.08% | -54.27% | -35.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | -12.19% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.77% | -21.87% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.08% | -29.06% | -61.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.19% | -10.58% | +2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -13.39% | +6.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 3.51% | -0.56% |
Volatility
FCNKX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) at 3.64%. This indicates that FCNKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCNKX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 3.64% | +2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.17% | 7.31% | +3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.98% | 11.01% | +8.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 10.50% | +8.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 288.07% | 16.57% | +271.50% |