FCMQX vs. DFSMX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FCMQX (Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class I) and DFSMX (DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FCMQX returned 1.91%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for DFSMX. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCMQX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for DFSMX.

Performance

FCMQX vs. DFSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class I (FCMQX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCMQX achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly higher than DFSMX's 1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FCMQX has outperformed DFSMX with an annualized return of 1.91%, while DFSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.26% annualized return.

FCMQX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 1.81%
• YTD: 1.39%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 7.16%
• 3Y*: 4.10%
• 5Y*: 0.92%
• 10Y*: 1.91%

DFSMX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 1.15%
• 6M: 1.15%
• 1Y: 2.48%
• 3Y*: 2.71%
• 5Y*: 1.74%
• 10Y*: 1.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCMQX vs. DFSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCMQX Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class I	1.39%	5.61%	1.40%	6.08%	-9.67%	1.31%	4.40%	7.51%	0.61%	5.78%
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio	1.15%	2.30%	2.84%	2.98%	-0.36%	-0.11%	0.83%	1.62%	1.22%	1.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FCMQX and DFSMX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2002	0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between FCMQX and DFSMX has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FCMQX vs. DFSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCMQX

FCMQX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FCMQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FCMQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FCMQX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FCMQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FCMQX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

DFSMX

DFSMX Risk / Return Rank: 99
DFSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
DFSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
DFSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
DFSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
DFSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCMQX vs. DFSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class I (FCMQX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCMQX	DFSMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	4.16	-1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	8.56	-4.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	4.46	-2.81
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	12.85	-10.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.79	76.73	-69.94

FCMQX vs. DFSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCMQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is lower than the DFSMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCMQX and DFSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCMQX vs. DFSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCMQX drawdown since its inception was -23.20%, which is greater than DFSMX's maximum drawdown of -2.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCMQX and DFSMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCMQX	DFSMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.20%	-2.66%	-20.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.41%	-0.20%	-3.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.40%	-0.49%	-4.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.05%	-1.66%	-12.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.05%	-1.69%	-12.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.84%	0.00%	-0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-0.23%	-3.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	0.03%	+1.03%

Volatility

FCMQX vs. DFSMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class I (FCMQX) has a higher volatility of 0.80% compared to DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX) at 0.18%. This indicates that FCMQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCMQX	DFSMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.80%	0.18%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.24%	0.38%	+1.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86%	0.61%	+2.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.97%	0.79%	+3.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.05%	0.77%	+3.28%

FCMQX vs. DFSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCMQX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSMX's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCMQX vs. DFSMX - Dividend Comparison

FCMQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than DFSMX's 2.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio	2.35%	2.08%	2.80%	1.94%	0.63%	0.19%	0.83%	1.22%	1.11%	0.95%	0.94%	0.95%
FCMQX Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class I	2.93%	3.74%	2.29%	2.36%	1.61%	2.20%	2.70%	2.74%	2.93%	3.42%	3.41%	2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCMQX and DFSMX in my portfolio?

FCMQX and DFSMX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCMQX or DFSMX?

FCMQX has higher volatility (0.80%) compared to DFSMX (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCMQX dropped -23.20% vs DFSMX's -2.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.