PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCMAX vs. FXIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCMAX vs. FXIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class A (FCMAX) and PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCMAX achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than FXIEX's 1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FCMAX has underperformed FXIEX with an annualized return of 1.73%, while FXIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.90% annualized return.


FCMAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.12%
6M
1.44%
1Y
7.00%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*
1.73%

FXIEX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.71%
YTD
1.71%
6M
2.13%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
2.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCMAX vs. FXIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCMAX
Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class A
1.12%5.28%1.20%5.85%-9.83%0.96%4.15%7.25%0.35%5.52%
FXIEX
PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE
1.71%3.37%5.16%8.92%-10.89%2.19%7.22%8.45%1.00%7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FCMAX and FXIEX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2012

0.72

The correlation between FCMAX and FXIEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCMAX vs. FXIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCMAX
FCMAX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FCMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FCMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FXIEX
FXIEX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FXIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FXIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCMAX vs. FXIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class A (FCMAX) and PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCMAXFXIEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.60

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

3.55

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.97

11.70

-4.72

FCMAX vs. FXIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the FXIEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCMAX and FXIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCMAXFXIEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.44

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.39

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.72

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.60

+0.01

Drawdowns

FCMAX vs. FXIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCMAX drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, which is greater than FXIEX's maximum drawdown of -15.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCMAX and FXIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCMAXFXIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

-15.25%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

-2.42%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.54%

-5.56%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.38%

-15.25%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.38%

-15.25%

+0.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-0.10%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-2.90%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

1.66%

-0.62%

Volatility

FCMAX vs. FXIEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class A (FCMAX) is 1.20%, while PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX) has a volatility of 1.30%. This indicates that FCMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCMAXFXIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

1.30%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

2.19%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83%

3.51%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.97%

4.37%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.04%

4.10%

-0.06%

FCMAX vs. FXIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCMAX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FXIEX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCMAX vs. FXIEX - Dividend Comparison

FCMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than FXIEX's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCMAX
Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class A
2.70%3.43%2.09%2.15%1.44%1.86%2.46%2.50%2.68%3.18%3.13%2.72%
FXIEX
PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE
2.79%2.75%4.53%3.98%3.25%2.63%3.37%3.63%3.79%2.67%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCMAX and FXIEX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXIEX has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to FCMAX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCMAX dropped -16.96% vs FXIEX's -15.25%.

FCMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCMAX and FXIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer