PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCLSX vs. URSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCLSX vs. URSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2040 Fund (FCLSX) and USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund (URSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCLSX achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than URSIX's 13.54% return.


FCLSX

1D
1.97%
1M
-1.02%
6M
7.22%
YTD
10.72%
1Y
22.07%
3Y*
18.07%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.82%

URSIX

1D
1.42%
1M
0.56%
6M
9.91%
YTD
13.54%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
10.23%
ALL TIME*
8.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCLSX vs. URSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2040 Fund
10.72%21.45%18.16%20.51%-17.74%16.91%18.37%25.92%-8.31%10.11%
URSIX
USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund
13.54%19.62%13.05%18.22%-15.78%17.70%10.17%20.09%-9.17%8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FCLSX and URSIX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.96

The correlation between FCLSX and URSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCLSX vs. URSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCLSX
FCLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FCLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FCLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

URSIX
URSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
URSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
URSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
URSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
URSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCLSX vs. URSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2040 Fund (FCLSX) and USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund (URSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCLSXURSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

2.81

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.90

12.09

-2.19

FCLSX vs. URSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the URSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCLSX and URSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCLSX vs. URSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCLSX drawdown since its inception was -31.26%, roughly equal to the maximum URSIX drawdown of -30.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLSX and URSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCLSXURSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.26%

-30.33%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-8.32%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.16%

-14.35%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.30%

-23.85%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-0.28%

-1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-4.40%

-0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.93%

+0.14%

Volatility

FCLSX vs. URSIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2040 Fund (FCLSX) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund (URSIX) at 3.06%. This indicates that FCLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCLSXURSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

3.06%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.83%

10.34%

+0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.70%

12.45%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.69%

14.21%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.75%

14.52%

+1.23%

FCLSX vs. URSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than URSIX's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FCLSX vs. URSIX - Dividend Comparison

FCLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.92%, more than URSIX's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2040 Fund
7.92%4.92%9.06%2.19%6.31%7.13%5.73%6.99%8.18%3.09%0.00%0.00%
URSIX
USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund
4.93%5.60%2.55%2.89%10.97%7.07%4.79%5.88%4.77%3.82%3.01%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FCLSX and URSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCLSX has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to URSIX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLSX dropped -31.26% vs URSIX's -30.33%.

URSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCLSX and URSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer