PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCLO vs. ZMAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCLO vs. ZMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity CLO ETF (FCLO) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FCLO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.50%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZMAY

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.79%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.77%
1Y
5.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCLO vs. ZMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FCLO and ZMAY is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026

-0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCLO vs. ZMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCLO

ZMAY
ZMAY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCLO vs. ZMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity CLO ETF (FCLO) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FCLO vs. ZMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCLOZMAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.96

4.24

-0.28

Drawdowns

FCLO vs. ZMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCLO drawdown since its inception was -0.58%, which is greater than ZMAY's maximum drawdown of -0.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLO and ZMAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCLOZMAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.58%

-0.39%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.06%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-0.05%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

Volatility

FCLO vs. ZMAY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCLOZMAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46%

1.45%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.46%

1.52%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.46%

1.52%

-0.06%

FCLO vs. ZMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCLO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ZMAY's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCLO vs. ZMAY - Dividend Comparison

FCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, while ZMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FCLO and ZMAY have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FCLO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FCLO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZMAY.

FCLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.00% for ZMAY.

FCLO is categorized as CLO, while ZMAY is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCLO and 0.79% for ZMAY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCLO and ZMAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer