PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCLO vs. FYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCLO vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity CLO ETF (FCLO) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FCLO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.50%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FYLD

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.58%
YTD
18.51%
6M
19.88%
1Y
39.75%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
11.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCLO vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FCLO and FYLD is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCLO vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCLO

FYLD
FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCLO vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity CLO ETF (FCLO) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FCLO vs. FYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCLOFYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.96

0.45

+3.51

Drawdowns

FCLO vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCLO drawdown since its inception was -0.58%, smaller than the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLO and FYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCLOFYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.58%

-44.55%

+43.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.54%

+1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-8.83%

+8.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

Volatility

FCLO vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCLOFYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46%

11.50%

-10.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.46%

16.23%

-14.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.46%

18.03%

-16.57%

FCLO vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCLO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCLO vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison

FCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than FYLD's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCLO
Fidelity CLO ETF
1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
3.65%4.07%5.41%6.06%6.13%4.74%3.94%3.73%5.17%2.85%2.72%3.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCLO and FYLD have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FCLO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FCLO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FYLD.

FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 1.56% for FCLO.

FCLO is categorized as CLO, while FYLD is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCLO and 0.59% for FYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCLO and FYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer