FCLO vs. AAAD
FCLO (Fidelity CLO ETF) and AAAD (PGIM AAA CLO Aggregate Duration ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCLO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for AAAD.
Performance
FCLO vs. AAAD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FCLO
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAAD
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCLO vs. AAAD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FCLO Fidelity CLO ETF | 0.55% |
AAAD PGIM AAA CLO Aggregate Duration ETF | 0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCLO and AAAD is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCLO vs. AAAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity CLO ETF (FCLO) and PGIM AAA CLO Aggregate Duration ETF (AAAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCLO vs. AAAD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCLO drawdown since its inception was -0.58%, smaller than the maximum AAAD drawdown of -1.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLO and AAAD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCLO | AAAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.58% | -1.13% | +0.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.76% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.07% | -0.37% | +0.30% |
Volatility
FCLO vs. AAAD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCLO | AAAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29% | 3.65% | -2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.29% | 3.65% | -2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.29% | 3.65% | -2.36% |
FCLO vs. AAAD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCLO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAD's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCLO vs. AAAD - Dividend Comparison
FCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than AAAD's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
AAAD PGIM AAA CLO Aggregate Duration ETF | 0.03% |
FCLO Fidelity CLO ETF | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCLO and AAAD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AAAD is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAAD is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FCLO.
FCLO has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.03% for AAAD.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCLO and 0.19% for AAAD.
Find the right allocation for FCLO and AAAD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer