FCLKX vs. DYNF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCLKX (Fidelity Large Cap Stock K6 Fund) and DYNF (BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF) are both funds - FCLKX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while DYNF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, FCLKX returned 16.31%/yr vs 15.04%/yr for DYNF. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCLKX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DYNF.

Performance

FCLKX vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Large Cap Stock K6 Fund (FCLKX) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCLKX achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly lower than DYNF's 11.55% return.

FCLKX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 3.27%
• YTD: 9.79%
• 6M: 11.67%
• 1Y: 30.58%
• 3Y*: 25.49%
• 5Y*: 16.31%
• 10Y*: —

DYNF

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 5.74%
• YTD: 11.55%
• 6M: 11.74%
• 1Y: 30.19%
• 3Y*: 26.22%
• 5Y*: 15.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCLKX vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCLKX Fidelity Large Cap Stock K6 Fund	9.79%	27.34%	26.36%	23.93%	-6.79%	25.71%	9.15%	13.95%
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF	11.55%	20.00%	30.29%	36.25%	-20.27%	22.12%	13.47%	14.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FCLKX and DYNF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019	0.90

The correlation between FCLKX and DYNF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCLKX vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCLKX

FCLKX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FCLKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FCLKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FCLKX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FCLKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FCLKX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

DYNF

DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 73
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 71
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCLKX vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Stock K6 Fund (FCLKX) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCLKX	DYNF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	2.44	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.63	3.32	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.43	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	3.50	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.51	16.97	-1.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCLKX vs. DYNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCLKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the DYNF Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCLKX and DYNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCLKX	DYNF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	2.44	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98	0.86	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.83	0.00

Drawdowns

FCLKX vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCLKX drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, which is greater than DYNF's maximum drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLKX and DYNF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCLKX	DYNF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.09%	-34.72%	-2.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.42%	-8.67%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.09%	-18.70%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.16%	-28.65%	+6.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.57%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.46%	-5.98%	+1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	1.78%	+0.25%

Volatility

FCLKX vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Large Cap Stock K6 Fund (FCLKX) is 2.87%, while BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that FCLKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DYNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCLKX	DYNF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	3.27%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.26%	9.55%	-0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.02%	12.44%	-0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.82%	17.50%	-0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.16%	19.90%	-0.74%

FCLKX vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCLKX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DYNF's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCLKX vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison

FCLKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than DYNF's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF	0.89%	1.01%	0.65%	1.11%	1.66%	2.89%	1.52%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%
FCLKX Fidelity Large Cap Stock K6 Fund	4.14%	4.55%	4.65%	3.07%	35.30%	6.51%	3.43%	2.52%	4.11%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCLKX and DYNF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FCLKX and DYNF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCLKX or DYNF?

DYNF has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to FCLKX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLKX dropped -37.09% vs DYNF's -34.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCLKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.