PortfoliosLab logo
LCSIX vs. DBMF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LCSIX and DBMF is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

LCSIX vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LCSIX:

-1.40

DBMF:

-1.09

Sortino Ratio

LCSIX:

-1.77

DBMF:

-1.28

Omega Ratio

LCSIX:

0.78

DBMF:

0.84

Calmar Ratio

LCSIX:

-0.69

DBMF:

-0.60

Martin Ratio

LCSIX:

-1.45

DBMF:

-0.99

Ulcer Index

LCSIX:

6.30%

DBMF:

10.08%

Daily Std Dev

LCSIX:

6.56%

DBMF:

9.86%

Max Drawdown

LCSIX:

-25.05%

DBMF:

-20.39%

Current Drawdown

LCSIX:

-11.95%

DBMF:

-14.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCSIX achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's -2.76% return.


LCSIX

YTD

0.34%

1M

-1.35%

6M

-3.58%

1Y

-9.14%

3Y*

-3.51%

5Y*

1.14%

10Y*

4.70%

DBMF

YTD

-2.76%

1M

0.04%

6M

-2.93%

1Y

-10.68%

3Y*

-1.46%

5Y*

5.73%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LCSIX vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LCSIX vs. DBMF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCSIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LCSIX is 00
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LCSIX is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LCSIX is 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LCSIX is 00
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LCSIX is 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LCSIX is 11
Martin Ratio Rank

DBMF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DBMF is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DBMF is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DBMF is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DBMF is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DBMF is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DBMF is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LCSIX vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LCSIX Sharpe Ratio is -1.40, which is comparable to the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of -1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCSIX and DBMF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LCSIX vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

LCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than DBMF's 6.04% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LCSIX
LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund
2.69%2.69%1.89%10.75%7.14%2.94%0.54%12.36%0.02%3.20%7.35%9.86%
DBMF
iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
6.04%5.75%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LCSIX vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCSIX drawdown since its inception was -25.05%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCSIX and DBMF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LCSIX vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) have volatilities of 1.76% and 1.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...