FCLD vs. TSXU
FCLD (Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - FCLD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCLD charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
FCLD vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCLD achieves a 34.57% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
FCLD
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- 19.91%
- YTD
- 34.57%
- 6M
- 36.74%
- 1Y
- 45.14%
- 3Y*
- 28.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCLD vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | 34.57% | 1.51% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCLD and TSXU is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCLD vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
FCLD
TSXU
FCLD vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCLD | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCLD | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 4.53 | -4.20 |
Drawdowns
FCLD vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCLD drawdown since its inception was -50.85%, which is greater than TSXU's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLD and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCLD | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.85% | -35.62% | -15.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.00% | -0.92% | -3.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.51% | -10.56% | -9.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.64% | — | — |
Volatility
FCLD vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCLD | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.40% | 78.68% | -51.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 78.68% | -48.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 78.68% | -48.18% |
FCLD vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCLD vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
FCLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than TSXU's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.26% | 0.13% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCLD and TSXU have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.02% for FCLD.
FCLD is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. FCLD tracks Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FCLD and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for FCLD and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer