FCLD vs. MSFT
FCLD (Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, FCLD returned 28.24%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for MSFT. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FCLD vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCLD achieves a 34.57% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -11.24% return.
FCLD
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- 19.91%
- YTD
- 34.57%
- 6M
- 36.74%
- 1Y
- 45.14%
- 3Y*
- 28.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFT
- 1D
- -3.17%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- -11.24%
- 6M
- -10.15%
- 1Y
- -6.96%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 25.03%
FCLD vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | 34.57% | 8.19% | 21.80% | 53.05% | -41.32% | -1.32% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -11.24% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 14.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCLD and MSFT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021 | 0.65 |
The correlation between FCLD and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCLD vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
FCLD
MSFT
FCLD vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCLD | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.97 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | -0.21 | +2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | -0.44 | +7.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCLD | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | -0.28 | +1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.75 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
FCLD vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCLD drawdown since its inception was -50.85%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLD and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCLD | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.85% | -69.38% | +18.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.48% | -33.91% | +16.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.80% | -33.91% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.00% | -20.67% | +16.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.51% | -21.78% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.64% | 15.95% | -9.31% |
Volatility
FCLD vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) has a higher volatility of 10.45% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 9.95%. This indicates that FCLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCLD | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.45% | 9.95% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.07% | 22.34% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.40% | 25.12% | +2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 26.63% | +3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 27.04% | +3.46% |
Dividends
FCLD vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
FCLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than MSFT's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.26% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCLD and MSFT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCLD has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to MSFT (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLD dropped -50.85% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
FCLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCLD and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer