FCLD vs. FREL
FCLD (Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF) and FREL (Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCLD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FREL is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FCLD returned 28.24%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for FREL. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCLD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FREL.
Performance
FCLD vs. FREL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCLD achieves a 34.57% return, which is significantly higher than FREL's 7.59% return.
FCLD
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- 19.91%
- YTD
- 34.57%
- 6M
- 36.74%
- 1Y
- 45.14%
- 3Y*
- 28.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FREL
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.09%
- 10Y*
- 5.67%
FCLD vs. FREL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | 34.57% | 8.19% | 21.80% | 53.05% | -41.32% | -1.32% |
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 7.59% | 3.09% | 5.05% | 11.74% | -26.21% | 12.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCLD and FREL is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FCLD and FREL has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FCLD vs. FREL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCLD
FREL
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FCLD
FREL
Real Estate
FCLD
FREL
Communication Services
FCLD
FREL
Consumer Cyclical
FCLD
FREL
-
Basic Materials
FCLD
-
FREL
Consumer Defensive
FCLD
-
FREL
-
Energy
FCLD
-
FREL
Financial Services
FCLD
-
FREL
Healthcare
FCLD
-
FREL
-
Industrials
FCLD
-
FREL
-
Utilities
FCLD
-
FREL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCLD vs. FREL — Risk / Return Rank
FCLD
FREL
FCLD vs. FREL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCLD | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.14 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 1.17 | +1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 3.67 | +3.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCLD | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 0.75 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.25 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
FCLD vs. FREL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCLD drawdown since its inception was -50.85%, which is greater than FREL's maximum drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLD and FREL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCLD | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.85% | -42.61% | -8.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.48% | -8.45% | -9.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.80% | -17.54% | -17.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.00% | -3.93% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.51% | -9.95% | -10.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.64% | 2.68% | +3.96% |
Volatility
FCLD vs. FREL - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) has a higher volatility of 10.45% compared to Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) at 3.75%. This indicates that FCLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FREL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCLD | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.45% | 3.75% | +6.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.07% | 9.27% | +12.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.40% | 13.17% | +14.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 18.84% | +11.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 20.67% | +9.83% |
FCLD vs. FREL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FREL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCLD vs. FREL - Dividend Comparison
FCLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than FREL's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.26% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 3.34% | 3.59% | 3.48% | 3.73% | 3.57% | 2.34% | 3.77% | 3.32% | 5.54% | 3.27% | 4.01% | 3.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCLD and FREL have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCLD has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to FREL (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLD dropped -50.85% vs FREL's -42.61%.
On 3-year performance, FCLD leads with 28.24% vs 9.05% for FREL. On fees, FREL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FREL has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FCLD has performed better with a 28.24% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FREL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FCLD.
FREL has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 0.02% for FCLD.
FCLD is categorized as Technology Equities, while FREL is REIT. FCLD tracks Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FREL tracks MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FCLD and 0.08% for FREL.
FCLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCLD and FREL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer