FCIQ.TO vs. FCUV.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

FCIQ.TO (Fidelity International High Quality ETF) and FCUV.TO (Fidelity U.S. Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCIQ.TO is a International Equity fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FCUV.TO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Canada U.S. Value Index. FCIQ.TO is actively managed, while FCUV.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCIQ.TO returned 6.75%/yr vs 21.12%/yr for FCUV.TO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCIQ.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FCUV.TO.

Performance

FCIQ.TO vs. FCUV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity International High Quality ETF (FCIQ.TO) and Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCIQ.TO achieves a 12.55% return, which is significantly lower than FCUV.TO's 17.80% return.

FCIQ.TO

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 2.68%
• 6M: 7.49%
• YTD: 12.55%
• 1Y: 13.05%
• 3Y*: 13.45%
• 5Y*: 6.75%
• 10Y*: —

FCUV.TO

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 1.95%
• 6M: 13.24%
• YTD: 17.80%
• 1Y: 34.68%
• 3Y*: 25.54%
• 5Y*: 21.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCIQ.TO vs. FCUV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FCIQ.TO Fidelity International High Quality ETF	12.55%	11.87%	11.21%	17.76%	-16.23%	5.22%	18.75%
FCUV.TO Fidelity U.S. Value ETF	17.80%	14.83%	35.81%	19.99%	2.58%	38.13%	13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FCIQ.TO and FCUV.TO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2020	0.51

The correlation between FCIQ.TO and FCUV.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCIQ.TO vs. FCUV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCIQ.TO

FCIQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 30
FCIQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
FCIQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FCIQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FCIQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FCIQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 33

FCUV.TO

FCUV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 90
FCUV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FCUV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FCUV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FCUV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FCUV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCIQ.TO vs. FCUV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International High Quality ETF (FCIQ.TO) and Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCIQ.TO	FCUV.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	2.33	-1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	3.23	-1.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.42	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	5.20	-3.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.02	17.47	-13.45

FCIQ.TO vs. FCUV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCIQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the FCUV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCIQ.TO and FCUV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCIQ.TO vs. FCUV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCIQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.88%, which is greater than FCUV.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCIQ.TO and FCUV.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCIQ.TO	FCUV.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.88%	-16.47%	-16.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-6.70%	-2.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.41%	-16.47%	+3.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.88%	-16.47%	-16.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.23%	-1.60%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.85%	-2.50%	-4.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	1.99%	+1.26%

Volatility

FCIQ.TO vs. FCUV.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International High Quality ETF (FCIQ.TO) is 3.76%, while Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that FCIQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCUV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCIQ.TO	FCUV.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.76%	4.64%	-0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.52%	11.17%	+1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.16%	14.97%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.78%	15.36%	-0.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.56%	14.85%	+1.71%

FCIQ.TO vs. FCUV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCIQ.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FCUV.TO's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCIQ.TO vs. FCUV.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCIQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than FCUV.TO's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCIQ.TO Fidelity International High Quality ETF	1.18%	1.59%	1.64%	1.94%	2.54%	1.56%	0.54%	1.42%
FCUV.TO Fidelity U.S. Value ETF	0.88%	1.14%	1.03%	1.43%	2.71%	1.10%	3.42%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCIQ.TO and FCUV.TO in my portfolio?

FCIQ.TO and FCUV.TO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FCIQ.TO or FCUV.TO?

On fees, FCUV.TO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCIQ.TO or FCUV.TO?

FCUV.TO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FCIQ.TO.

What is the main difference between FCIQ.TO and FCUV.TO?

FCIQ.TO is categorized as International Equity, while FCUV.TO is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCIQ.TO and 0.38% for FCUV.TO.