PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCIQ.TO vs. FCMO.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCIQ.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity International High Quality ETF (FCIQ.TO) and Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCIQ.TO achieves a 12.55% return, which is significantly lower than FCMO.NEO's 20.14% return.


FCIQ.TO

1D
0.90%
1M
2.68%
6M
7.49%
YTD
12.55%
1Y
13.05%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*

FCMO.NEO

1D
-0.65%
1M
-1.58%
6M
15.32%
YTD
20.14%
1Y
29.41%
3Y*
31.97%
5Y*
17.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCIQ.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FCIQ.TO
Fidelity International High Quality ETF
12.55%11.87%11.21%17.76%-16.23%5.22%18.40%
FCMO.NEO
Fidelity US Momentum ETF
20.14%13.77%53.26%13.09%-14.21%16.13%-61.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FCIQ.TO and FCMO.NEO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.40

The correlation between FCIQ.TO and FCMO.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCIQ.TO vs. FCMO.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCIQ.TO
FCIQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FCIQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCIQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCIQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FCIQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCIQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FCMO.NEO
FCMO.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FCMO.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCMO.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCMO.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FCMO.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCMO.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCIQ.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International High Quality ETF (FCIQ.TO) and Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCIQ.TOFCMO.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.28

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

2.71

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.02

9.01

-4.99

FCIQ.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCIQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the FCMO.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCIQ.TO and FCMO.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCIQ.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCIQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.88%, smaller than the maximum FCMO.NEO drawdown of -67.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCIQ.TO and FCMO.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCIQ.TOFCMO.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.88%

-67.39%

+34.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-10.91%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-21.82%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.88%

-26.93%

-5.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-8.56%

+7.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-48.77%

+41.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

3.27%

-0.02%

Volatility

FCIQ.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International High Quality ETF (FCIQ.TO) is 3.76%, while Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that FCIQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCMO.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCIQ.TOFCMO.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

5.56%

-1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.52%

16.89%

-4.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.16%

19.99%

-4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.78%

18.36%

-3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.56%

32.59%

-16.03%

FCIQ.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCIQ.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FCMO.NEO's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCIQ.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Dividend Comparison

FCIQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than FCMO.NEO's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FCIQ.TO
Fidelity International High Quality ETF
1.18%1.59%1.64%1.94%2.54%1.56%0.54%1.42%
FCMO.NEO
Fidelity US Momentum ETF
0.30%0.36%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCIQ.TO and FCMO.NEO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FCMO.NEO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FCMO.NEO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FCIQ.TO.

FCIQ.TO is categorized as International Equity, while FCMO.NEO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCIQ.TO and 0.38% for FCMO.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCIQ.TO and FCMO.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer