PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCIM.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCIM.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCIM.NEO achieves a 20.61% return, which is significantly higher than FEQT.NEO's 10.90% return.


FCIM.NEO

1D
0.48%
1M
6.20%
YTD
20.61%
6M
23.45%
1Y
38.70%
3Y*
31.32%
5Y*
18.33%
10Y*

FEQT.NEO

1D
0.54%
1M
4.10%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.77%
1Y
25.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCIM.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FCIM.NEO
Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF
20.61%37.03%6.75%
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
10.90%19.42%14.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FCIM.NEO and FEQT.NEO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2024

0.72

The correlation between FCIM.NEO and FEQT.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCIM.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCIM.NEO
FCIM.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FCIM.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCIM.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCIM.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FCIM.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCIM.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FEQT.NEO
FEQT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCIM.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCIM.NEOFEQT.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.12

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.01

13.53

-1.53

FCIM.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCIM.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCIM.NEO and FEQT.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCIM.NEOFEQT.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.36

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

1.79

-0.66

Drawdowns

FCIM.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCIM.NEO drawdown since its inception was -26.89%, which is greater than FEQT.NEO's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCIM.NEO and FEQT.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCIM.NEOFEQT.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.89%

-13.24%

-13.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.21%

-8.31%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.48%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-1.45%

-3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

1.91%

+1.32%

Volatility

FCIM.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) at 3.90%. This indicates that FCIM.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEQT.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCIM.NEOFEQT.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

3.90%

+2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.97%

8.89%

+5.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.65%

11.02%

+5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.82%

12.44%

+4.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.45%

12.44%

+4.01%

FCIM.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCIM.NEO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FEQT.NEO's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCIM.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO - Dividend Comparison

FCIM.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than FEQT.NEO's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FCIM.NEO
Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF
1.32%1.59%1.26%1.70%1.86%2.70%0.52%
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
0.82%0.91%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCIM.NEO and FEQT.NEO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FEQT.NEO is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FEQT.NEO is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FCIM.NEO.

FCIM.NEO is categorized as Momentum, while FEQT.NEO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCIM.NEO and 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCIM.NEO and FEQT.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer