PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCGLX vs. FHDDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCGLX vs. FHDDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class Z6 (FCGLX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6 (FHDDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCGLX achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly lower than FHDDX's 14.04% return.


FCGLX

1D
0.54%
1M
4.67%
YTD
12.42%
6M
14.07%
1Y
28.47%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*

FHDDX

1D
0.71%
1M
5.48%
YTD
14.04%
6M
15.52%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
21.50%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCGLX vs. FHDDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FCGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class Z6
12.42%23.32%13.97%19.59%-17.89%16.33%17.80%26.90%-12.20%
FHDDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6
14.04%22.85%16.77%20.77%-18.91%16.49%18.00%26.74%-11.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FCGLX and FHDDX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.99

The correlation between FCGLX and FHDDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCGLX vs. FHDDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCGLX
FCGLX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FCGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FCGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FHDDX
FHDDX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FHDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FHDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCGLX vs. FHDDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class Z6 (FCGLX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6 (FHDDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCGLXFHDDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.46

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

3.28

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.12

14.56

-1.44

FCGLX vs. FHDDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FHDDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCGLX and FHDDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCGLXFHDDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.50

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.73

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.74

0.00

Drawdowns

FCGLX vs. FHDDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCGLX drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, roughly equal to the maximum FHDDX drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCGLX and FHDDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCGLXFHDDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.21%

-31.34%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-9.70%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.03%

-15.50%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.13%

-27.68%

+0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-5.85%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.18%

+0.01%

Volatility

FCGLX vs. FHDDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class Z6 (FCGLX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6 (FHDDX) have volatilities of 4.14% and 4.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCGLXFHDDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

4.22%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

10.45%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.53%

12.75%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.96%

15.13%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

16.92%

-0.90%

FCGLX vs. FHDDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCGLX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FHDDX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCGLX vs. FHDDX - Dividend Comparison

FCGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than FHDDX's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class Z6
7.27%6.53%1.92%1.75%11.04%9.87%5.57%7.30%12.13%3.56%
FHDDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6
3.30%2.49%5.24%2.04%6.20%8.33%4.63%3.09%3.76%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FCGLX and FHDDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHDDX has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to FCGLX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCGLX dropped -31.21% vs FHDDX's -31.34%.

FHDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCGLX and FHDDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer