FCGI.TO vs. TBAL.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCGI.TO (Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF) and TBAL.TO (TD Balanced ETF Portfolio) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCGI.TO returned 8.93%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for TBAL.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCGI.TO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TBAL.TO.

Performance

FCGI.TO vs. TBAL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF (FCGI.TO) and TD Balanced ETF Portfolio (TBAL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCGI.TO achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly higher than TBAL.TO's 7.35% return.

FCGI.TO

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 2.49%
• YTD: 8.07%
• 6M: 7.90%
• 1Y: 19.77%
• 3Y*: 14.44%
• 5Y*: 8.93%
• 10Y*: —

TBAL.TO

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 3.94%
• YTD: 7.35%
• 6M: 7.13%
• 1Y: 18.59%
• 3Y*: 15.06%
• 5Y*: 9.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCGI.TO vs. TBAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FCGI.TO Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF	8.07%	13.21%	13.10%	9.65%	-5.30%	13.84%	5.53%
TBAL.TO TD Balanced ETF Portfolio	7.35%	13.83%	16.01%	15.85%	-12.63%	12.93%	5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FCGI.TO and TBAL.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2020	0.26

The correlation between FCGI.TO and TBAL.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCGI.TO vs. TBAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCGI.TO

FCGI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 91
FCGI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FCGI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FCGI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FCGI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FCGI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

TBAL.TO

TBAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 71
TBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
TBAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
TBAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 75
TBAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
TBAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCGI.TO vs. TBAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF (FCGI.TO) and TD Balanced ETF Portfolio (TBAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCGI.TO	TBAL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.95	2.40	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.98	3.46	+1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.94	1.45	+0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.08	3.12	+1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.70	13.41	+7.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCGI.TO vs. TBAL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCGI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is comparable to the TBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCGI.TO and TBAL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCGI.TO	TBAL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95	2.40	+0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.05	1.04	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.16	1.08	-1.23

Drawdowns

FCGI.TO vs. TBAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCGI.TO drawdown since its inception was -63.42%, which is greater than TBAL.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCGI.TO and TBAL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCGI.TO	TBAL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.42%	-17.34%	-46.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.91%	-5.98%	+2.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.26%	-9.03%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.16%	-17.34%	+6.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.46%	-0.40%	-20.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.69%	-3.54%	-39.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	1.39%	-0.43%

Volatility

FCGI.TO vs. TBAL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF (FCGI.TO) is 2.09%, while TD Balanced ETF Portfolio (TBAL.TO) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that FCGI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCGI.TO	TBAL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.09%	2.90%	-0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.45%	6.46%	-1.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.74%	7.78%	-1.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.59%	9.08%	-0.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.35%	8.97%	+13.38%

FCGI.TO vs. TBAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCGI.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than TBAL.TO's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCGI.TO vs. TBAL.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCGI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than TBAL.TO's 2.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FCGI.TO Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF	2.97%	3.25%	3.21%	3.50%	3.71%	2.49%	2.74%
TBAL.TO TD Balanced ETF Portfolio	2.30%	2.56%	2.54%	2.65%	2.65%	1.64%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCGI.TO and TBAL.TO in my portfolio?

FCGI.TO and TBAL.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FCGI.TO or TBAL.TO?

On fees, TBAL.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCGI.TO or TBAL.TO?

TBAL.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FCGI.TO.

What is the main difference between FCGI.TO and TBAL.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FCGI.TO and 0.15% for TBAL.TO.