FCGCX vs. PCLAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX).
FCGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. PCLAX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on May 28, 2010.
Performance
FCGCX vs. PCLAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCGCX vs. PCLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCGCX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C | 22.54% | 27.29% | 1.90% | -6.06% | 19.45% | 24.85% | 4.96% | 16.74% | -14.07% | 17.33% |
PCLAX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund | 30.70% | 4.13% | 5.76% | -0.14% | 22.73% | 43.18% | -9.67% | 19.19% | -12.47% | 10.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCGCX achieves a 22.54% return, which is significantly lower than PCLAX's 30.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCGCX having a 12.80% annualized return and PCLAX not far behind at 12.39%.
FCGCX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- 22.54%
- 6M
- 30.53%
- 1Y
- 50.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
PCLAX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 19.09%
- YTD
- 30.70%
- 6M
- 31.51%
- 1Y
- 32.30%
- 3Y*
- 13.39%
- 5Y*
- 17.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCGCX vs. PCLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCGCX has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLAX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCGCX vs. PCLAX — Risk / Return Rank
FCGCX
PCLAX
FCGCX vs. PCLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCGCX | PCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.48 | 1.81 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.99 | 2.35 | +0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.33 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 3.09 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.14 | 8.51 | +8.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCGCX | PCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 1.81 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.90 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.31 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.15 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCGCX and PCLAX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FCGCX vs. PCLAX - Dividend Comparison
FCGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than PCLAX's 1.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCGCX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C | 1.21% | 1.48% | 1.38% | 0.80% | 1.09% | 2.41% | 0.59% | 1.94% | 1.11% | 0.36% | 0.71% | 1.49% |
PCLAX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund | 1.29% | 1.20% | 5.20% | 4.58% | 44.24% | 75.67% | 0.45% | 2.07% | 18.31% | 12.18% | 0.09% | 1.77% |
Drawdowns
FCGCX vs. PCLAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCGCX drawdown since its inception was -59.67%, smaller than the maximum PCLAX drawdown of -68.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCGCX and PCLAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCGCX | PCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.67% | -68.19% | +8.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.67% | -10.92% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.43% | -21.75% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.31% | -52.00% | +2.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.41% | 0.00% | -2.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.40% | -25.92% | +4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 3.96% | -1.10% |
Volatility
FCGCX vs. PCLAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX) is 6.10%, while PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that FCGCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCGCX | PCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 10.44% | -4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.75% | 14.74% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.52% | 18.96% | +1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 19.25% | +2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 40.64% | -18.10% |