FCFMX vs. SVPFX
FCFMX (Fidelity Series Total Market Index Fund) and SVPFX (Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FCFMX returned 13.16%/yr vs 2.10%/yr for SVPFX. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCFMX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for SVPFX.
Performance
FCFMX vs. SVPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCFMX achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly higher than SVPFX's 1.49% return.
FCFMX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 29.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- —
SVPFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.10%
- 10Y*
- —
FCFMX vs. SVPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFMX Fidelity Series Total Market Index Fund | 12.09% | 17.43% | 23.92% | 26.15% | -19.53% | 15.20% |
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund | 1.49% | 4.19% | 3.82% | 5.30% | -4.37% | 0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCFMX and SVPFX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021 | 0.13 |
The correlation between FCFMX and SVPFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (5 years) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCFMX vs. SVPFX — Risk / Return Rank
FCFMX
SVPFX
FCFMX vs. SVPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Total Market Index Fund (FCFMX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCFMX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.53 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 3.97 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.56 | 13.46 | +2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCFMX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.35 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.38 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.39 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
FCFMX vs. SVPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCFMX drawdown since its inception was -34.99%, which is greater than SVPFX's maximum drawdown of -6.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFMX and SVPFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCFMX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.99% | -6.37% | -28.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -1.33% | -7.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.41% | -5.32% | -14.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.34% | -6.37% | -18.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.20% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -1.93% | -3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 0.43% | +1.50% |
Volatility
FCFMX vs. SVPFX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Series Total Market Index Fund (FCFMX) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) at 0.67%. This indicates that FCFMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCFMX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 0.67% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.23% | 1.47% | +7.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 2.26% | +10.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.42% | 5.60% | +11.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 5.51% | +14.90% |
FCFMX vs. SVPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCFMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SVPFX's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCFMX vs. SVPFX - Dividend Comparison
FCFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than SVPFX's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFMX Fidelity Series Total Market Index Fund | 1.00% | 1.41% | 1.27% | 1.45% | 1.78% | 1.56% | 1.88% | 1.35% |
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund | 2.47% | 1.83% | 4.37% | 4.29% | 0.76% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCFMX and SVPFX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCFMX has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to SVPFX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFMX dropped -34.99% vs SVPFX's -6.37%.
FCFMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCFMX and SVPFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer