PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCEF vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCEF vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF (FCEF) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCEF achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly lower than NTSX's 9.77% return.


FCEF

1D
0.08%
1M
0.77%
YTD
7.01%
6M
8.03%
1Y
17.14%
3Y*
15.92%
5Y*
6.02%
10Y*

NTSX

1D
0.10%
1M
4.88%
YTD
9.77%
6M
9.78%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
19.80%
5Y*
10.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCEF vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FCEF
First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF
7.01%14.39%17.51%10.27%-19.51%19.50%3.80%28.28%-12.03%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
9.77%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FCEF and NTSX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.73

The correlation between FCEF and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCEF vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCEF
NTSX

Financial Services

25.5%
12.3%

Utilities

15.0%
2.1%

Energy

13.6%
3.5%

Technology

11.9%
35.1%

Healthcare

9.2%
8.4%

Industrials

8.5%
7.7%

Communication Services

4.4%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
10.1%

Real Estate

3.5%
1.5%

Basic Materials

2.7%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
5.5%

Financial Services

FCEF
25.5%
NTSX
12.3%

Utilities

FCEF
15.0%
NTSX
2.1%

Energy

FCEF
13.6%
NTSX
3.5%

Technology

FCEF
11.9%
NTSX
35.1%

Healthcare

FCEF
9.2%
NTSX
8.4%

Industrials

FCEF
8.5%
NTSX
7.7%

Communication Services

FCEF
4.4%
NTSX
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FCEF
3.7%
NTSX
10.1%

Real Estate

FCEF
3.5%
NTSX
1.5%

Basic Materials

FCEF
2.7%
NTSX
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

FCEF
2.1%
NTSX
5.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCEF vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCEF
FCEF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCEF vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF (FCEF) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCEFNTSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

2.23

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

3.01

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.40

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

3.00

-0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.41

13.28

-1.87

FCEF vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCEF and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCEFNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.23

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.60

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.72

-0.18

Drawdowns

FCEF vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCEF drawdown since its inception was -44.81%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCEF and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCEFNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.81%

-31.34%

-13.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-9.16%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.39%

-16.82%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.32%

-31.34%

+6.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

0.00%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.28%

-6.80%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

2.07%

-0.52%

Volatility

FCEF vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF (FCEF) is 2.13%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 3.23%. This indicates that FCEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCEFNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.13%

3.23%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.19%

9.55%

-3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.73%

12.25%

-4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.19%

17.03%

-4.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.42%

18.27%

-2.85%

FCEF vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCEF has a 2.91% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCEF vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

FCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, more than NTSX's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FCEF
First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF
6.82%7.05%7.13%7.17%7.26%4.74%5.03%5.07%5.96%4.90%1.51%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.06%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCEF and NTSX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSX has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to FCEF (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCEF dropped -44.81% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 10.08% vs 6.02% for FCEF. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FCEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 10.08% return vs 6.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 2.91% for FCEF.

FCEF has the higher dividend yield at 6.82%, compared with 1.06% for NTSX.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 2.91% for FCEF and 0.20% for NTSX.

FCEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCEF and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer