FCEF vs. FTXL
FCEF (First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCEF is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by First Trust, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. FCEF is actively managed, while FTXL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCEF returned 5.84%/yr vs 34.63%/yr for FTXL. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCEF charges 2.91%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
FCEF vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCEF achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.
FCEF
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 6.40%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- 16.10%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.84%
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 30.59%
- YTD
- 115.70%
- 6M
- 113.17%
- 1Y
- 225.15%
- 3Y*
- 61.52%
- 5Y*
- 34.63%
- 10Y*
- —
FCEF vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCEF First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF | 6.40% | 14.39% | 17.51% | 10.27% | -19.51% | 19.50% | 3.80% | 28.28% | -9.65% | 15.72% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 115.70% | 48.94% | 7.59% | 54.41% | -33.88% | 36.04% | 46.08% | 61.77% | -14.47% | 32.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCEF and FTXL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2016 | 0.57 |
The correlation between FCEF and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
FCEF vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCEF
FTXL
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
FCEF
FTXL
-
Utilities
FCEF
FTXL
-
Energy
FCEF
FTXL
-
Technology
FCEF
FTXL
Healthcare
FCEF
FTXL
-
Industrials
FCEF
FTXL
Communication Services
FCEF
FTXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
FCEF
FTXL
-
Real Estate
FCEF
FTXL
-
Basic Materials
FCEF
FTXL
-
Consumer Defensive
FCEF
FTXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCEF vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
FCEF
FTXL
FCEF vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF (FCEF) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCEF | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.09 | 6.33 | -4.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | 5.74 | -2.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.78 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 15.62 | -13.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.40 | 58.28 | -47.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCEF | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 6.33 | -4.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.97 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.94 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
FCEF vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCEF drawdown since its inception was -44.81%, roughly equal to the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCEF and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCEF | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.81% | -43.87% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.03% | -14.51% | +7.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | -41.57% | +29.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.32% | -43.87% | +18.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | 0.00% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.28% | -10.56% | +4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 3.88% | -2.33% |
Volatility
FCEF vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF (FCEF) is 2.11%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that FCEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCEF | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.11% | 14.28% | -12.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.18% | 28.98% | -22.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.75% | 35.94% | -28.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.19% | 36.02% | -23.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 34.25% | -18.83% |
FCEF vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCEF has a 2.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCEF vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
FCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%, more than FTXL's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCEF First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF | 6.86% | 7.05% | 7.13% | 7.17% | 7.26% | 4.74% | 5.03% | 5.07% | 5.96% | 4.90% | 1.51% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.12% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCEF and FTXL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to FCEF (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCEF dropped -44.81% vs FTXL's -43.87%.
On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 5.84% for FCEF. On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FCEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 5.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 2.91% for FCEF.
FCEF has the higher dividend yield at 6.86%, compared with 0.12% for FTXL.
FCEF is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while FTXL is Semiconductors. Their fees differ too: 2.91% for FCEF and 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCEF and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer