PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCDSX vs. TPINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCDSX vs. TPINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series International Credit Fund (FCDSX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCDSX achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than TPINX's 2.00% return.


FCDSX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.60%
YTD
0.86%
6M
0.90%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
7.63%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*

TPINX

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.03%
YTD
2.00%
6M
2.78%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
2.28%
5Y*
-0.84%
10Y*
0.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCDSX vs. TPINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCDSX
Fidelity Series International Credit Fund
0.86%7.22%8.47%7.64%-17.34%-0.07%8.34%13.86%-1.04%1.91%
TPINX
Templeton Global Bond Fund
2.00%15.02%-11.95%2.45%-6.17%-5.06%-4.41%0.63%1.26%-1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FCDSX and TPINX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.29

Over the past year, FCDSX and TPINX have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCDSX vs. TPINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCDSX
FCDSX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FCDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

TPINX
TPINX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TPINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPINX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TPINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPINX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCDSX vs. TPINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series International Credit Fund (FCDSX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCDSXTPINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

0.98

+0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

1.44

+1.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.18

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.09

+0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.04

3.60

+2.45

FCDSX vs. TPINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCDSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the TPINX Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCDSX and TPINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCDSXTPINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

0.98

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

-0.10

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.77

-0.05

Drawdowns

FCDSX vs. TPINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCDSX drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum TPINX drawdown of -26.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCDSX and TPINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCDSXTPINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.33%

-26.45%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.78%

-6.36%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.78%

-13.03%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.33%

-19.15%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-13.17%

+12.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-4.84%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

1.93%

-1.04%

Volatility

FCDSX vs. TPINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series International Credit Fund (FCDSX) is 0.99%, while Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX) has a volatility of 2.13%. This indicates that FCDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCDSXTPINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

2.13%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

5.93%

-3.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87%

7.25%

-4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.44%

8.13%

-3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.13%

7.28%

-3.15%

FCDSX vs. TPINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCDSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TPINX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCDSX vs. TPINX - Dividend Comparison

FCDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than TPINX's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCDSX
Fidelity Series International Credit Fund
4.18%4.58%4.81%3.67%6.73%3.04%6.58%7.12%4.17%1.90%0.00%0.00%
TPINX
Templeton Global Bond Fund
5.03%4.29%5.77%3.87%5.17%5.38%4.59%6.12%6.53%3.34%2.33%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCDSX and TPINX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPINX has higher volatility (2.13%) compared to FCDSX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCDSX dropped -22.33% vs TPINX's -26.45%.

FCDSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCDSX and TPINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer