FCDCX vs. HASCX
FCDCX (Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class C) and HASCX (Harbor Small Cap Value Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FCDCX returned 11.67%/yr vs 11.34%/yr for HASCX. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FCDCX charges 1.98%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for HASCX.
Performance
FCDCX vs. HASCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCDCX achieves a 19.08% return, which is significantly lower than HASCX's 27.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCDCX having a 11.67% annualized return and HASCX not far behind at 11.34%.
FCDCX
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 12.81%
- YTD
- 19.08%
- 1Y
- 36.08%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.31%
HASCX
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- 6M
- 14.44%
- YTD
- 27.65%
- 1Y
- 39.94%
- 3Y*
- 14.36%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FCDCX vs. HASCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCDCX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class C | 19.08% | 13.17% | 13.33% | 18.21% | -19.13% | 23.37% | 20.43% | 29.00% | -9.94% | 10.46% |
HASCX Harbor Small Cap Value Fund | 27.65% | 3.78% | 10.93% | 15.18% | -9.59% | 14.55% | 13.15% | 28.97% | -16.16% | 21.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCDCX and HASCX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2006 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FCDCX and HASCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCDCX vs. HASCX — Risk / Return Rank
FCDCX
HASCX
FCDCX vs. HASCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class C (FCDCX) and Harbor Small Cap Value Fund (HASCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCDCX | HASCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 3.61 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.08 | 11.63 | +0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCDCX vs. HASCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCDCX drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, which is greater than HASCX's maximum drawdown of -58.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCDCX and HASCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCDCX | HASCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.05% | -58.90% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.11% | -9.89% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.71% | -28.34% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.01% | -28.34% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.51% | -42.15% | +3.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -5.43% | +2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.77% | -8.10% | -4.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 3.08% | -0.38% |
Volatility
FCDCX vs. HASCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class C (FCDCX) is 4.47%, while Harbor Small Cap Value Fund (HASCX) has a volatility of 6.00%. This indicates that FCDCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HASCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCDCX | HASCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 6.00% | -1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.25% | 15.32% | -1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.53% | 20.25% | -1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 20.86% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.86% | 22.95% | -1.09% |
FCDCX vs. HASCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCDCX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than HASCX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCDCX vs. HASCX - Dividend Comparison
FCDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than HASCX's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCDCX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class C | 0.39% | 0.46% | 2.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.76% | 1.62% | 2.06% | 24.14% | 11.06% | 1.26% | 7.10% |
HASCX Harbor Small Cap Value Fund | 2.67% | 3.41% | 0.62% | 6.99% | 7.25% | 5.64% | 0.43% | 1.41% | 11.18% | 1.98% | 0.36% | 3.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FCDCX and HASCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HASCX has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to FCDCX (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCDCX dropped -66.05% vs HASCX's -58.90%.
HASCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCDCX and HASCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer