FCDCX vs. AUERX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FCDCX (Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class C) and AUERX (Auer Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FCDCX returned 11.69%/yr vs 16.06%/yr for AUERX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCDCX charges 1.98%/yr vs 2.37%/yr for AUERX.

Performance

FCDCX vs. AUERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class C (FCDCX) and Auer Growth Fund (AUERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCDCX achieves a 16.50% return, which is significantly lower than AUERX's 17.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FCDCX has underperformed AUERX with an annualized return of 11.69%, while AUERX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.06% annualized return.

FCDCX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -0.91%
• YTD: 16.50%
• 6M: 14.41%
• 1Y: 38.94%
• 3Y*: 19.44%
• 5Y*: 8.82%
• 10Y*: 11.69%

AUERX

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: 4.15%
• YTD: 17.49%
• 6M: 17.19%
• 1Y: 49.71%
• 3Y*: 28.82%
• 5Y*: 19.76%
• 10Y*: 16.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCDCX vs. AUERX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCDCX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class C	16.50%	13.17%	13.33%	18.21%	-19.13%	23.37%	20.43%	29.00%	-9.94%	10.46%
AUERX Auer Growth Fund	17.49%	30.10%	11.12%	21.42%	9.95%	45.11%	-1.85%	27.96%	-25.63%	28.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FCDCX and AUERX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007	0.86

The correlation between FCDCX and AUERX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCDCX vs. AUERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCDCX

FCDCX Risk / Return Rank: 67
FCDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
FCDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FCDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FCDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FCDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

AUERX

AUERX Risk / Return Rank: 90
AUERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
AUERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AUERX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
AUERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
AUERX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCDCX vs. AUERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class C (FCDCX) and Auer Growth Fund (AUERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCDCX	AUERX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	3.16	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	4.07	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.54	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.88	5.03	-1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.06	21.64	-6.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCDCX vs. AUERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCDCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is lower than the AUERX Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCDCX and AUERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCDCX	AUERX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	3.16	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.80	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.66	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.21	+0.10

Drawdowns

FCDCX vs. AUERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCDCX drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, roughly equal to the maximum AUERX drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCDCX and AUERX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCDCX	AUERX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.05%	-67.23%	+1.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.11%	-10.06%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.71%	-34.80%	+7.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.01%	-34.80%	+3.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.51%	-51.89%	+13.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	0.00%	-0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.86%	-24.87%	+12.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	2.33%	+0.27%

Volatility

FCDCX vs. AUERX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class C (FCDCX) and Auer Growth Fund (AUERX) have volatilities of 5.06% and 4.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCDCX	AUERX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.06%	4.94%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.31%	11.70%	+1.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.76%	16.02%	+1.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.60%	24.84%	-3.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.86%	24.38%	-2.52%

FCDCX vs. AUERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCDCX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is lower than AUERX's 2.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCDCX vs. AUERX - Dividend Comparison

FCDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than AUERX's 9.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AUERX Auer Growth Fund	9.69%	11.39%	24.55%	4.54%	5.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FCDCX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class C	0.40%	0.46%	2.71%	0.00%	0.00%	11.76%	1.62%	2.06%	24.14%	11.06%	1.26%	7.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCDCX and AUERX in my portfolio?

FCDCX and AUERX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCDCX or AUERX?

FCDCX has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to AUERX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCDCX dropped -66.05% vs AUERX's -67.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AUERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.