PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCCQ.TO achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than WXM.TO's 18.83% return.


FCCQ.TO

1D
-0.77%
1M
1.71%
YTD
6.62%
6M
7.88%
1Y
31.20%
3Y*
22.31%
5Y*
13.37%
10Y*

WXM.TO

1D
-0.33%
1M
4.70%
YTD
18.83%
6M
22.68%
1Y
46.31%
3Y*
29.82%
5Y*
18.57%
10Y*
15.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FCCQ.TO
Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF
6.62%31.01%21.58%11.02%-7.52%22.24%2.30%10.49%
WXM.TO
CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF
18.83%38.16%33.93%3.35%-0.42%20.98%4.61%23.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FCCQ.TO and WXM.TO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2019

0.57

Over the past year, FCCQ.TO and WXM.TO have become more correlated (0.79) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.

FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCCQ.TO
WXM.TO

Financial Services

27.4%
17.3%

Basic Materials

23.0%
13.5%

Technology

12.9%
4.9%

Energy

11.2%
18.5%

Consumer Defensive

10.7%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
6.9%

Healthcare

3.8%

-

Industrials

3.6%
18.2%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Communication Services

-

6.0%

Utilities

-

8.6%

Financial Services

FCCQ.TO
27.4%
WXM.TO
17.3%

Basic Materials

FCCQ.TO
23.0%
WXM.TO
13.5%

Technology

FCCQ.TO
12.9%
WXM.TO
4.9%

Energy

FCCQ.TO
11.2%
WXM.TO
18.5%

Consumer Defensive

FCCQ.TO
10.7%
WXM.TO
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FCCQ.TO
5.7%
WXM.TO
6.9%

Healthcare

FCCQ.TO
3.8%
WXM.TO

-

Industrials

FCCQ.TO
3.6%
WXM.TO
18.2%

Real Estate

FCCQ.TO
1.8%
WXM.TO

-

Communication Services

FCCQ.TO

-

WXM.TO
6.0%

Utilities

FCCQ.TO

-

WXM.TO
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCCQ.TO
FCCQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FCCQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCCQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCCQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FCCQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCCQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

WXM.TO
WXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
WXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
WXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
WXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
WXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCCQ.TOWXM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.55

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

4.90

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.87

21.82

-9.95

FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCCQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is lower than the WXM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCCQ.TO and WXM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCCQ.TOWXM.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

3.10

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

1.18

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.91

-0.11

Drawdowns

FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCCQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, smaller than the maximum WXM.TO drawdown of -40.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCQ.TO and WXM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCCQ.TOWXM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.31%

-40.45%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.29%

-9.49%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-12.13%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.97%

-15.87%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-0.33%

-2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-4.48%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.13%

+0.51%

Volatility

FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO) have volatilities of 4.12% and 4.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCCQ.TOWXM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

4.06%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

11.86%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.47%

15.02%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.72%

15.85%

-2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

16.78%

-0.73%

FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCCQ.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WXM.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCCQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than WXM.TO's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCCQ.TO
Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF
1.47%1.45%1.83%2.40%2.31%1.90%2.10%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WXM.TO
CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF
1.15%1.25%1.27%1.38%2.25%1.04%0.78%0.94%1.44%1.38%1.58%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCCQ.TO and WXM.TO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FCCQ.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FCCQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WXM.TO.

FCCQ.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while WXM.TO is Momentum. FCCQ.TO tracks Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality Index, while WXM.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Target Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and CI Global Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FCCQ.TO and 0.65% for WXM.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCCQ.TO and WXM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer