FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO
FCCQ.TO (Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF) and WXM.TO (CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCCQ.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality Index, while WXM.TO is a Momentum fund tracking the Morningstar Canada Target Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCCQ.TO returned 13.37%/yr vs 18.57%/yr for WXM.TO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCCQ.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for WXM.TO.
Performance
FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCCQ.TO achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than WXM.TO's 18.83% return.
FCCQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 7.88%
- 1Y
- 31.20%
- 3Y*
- 22.31%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- —
WXM.TO
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 18.83%
- 6M
- 22.68%
- 1Y
- 46.31%
- 3Y*
- 29.82%
- 5Y*
- 18.57%
- 10Y*
- 15.24%
FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF | 6.62% | 31.01% | 21.58% | 11.02% | -7.52% | 22.24% | 2.30% | 10.49% |
WXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF | 18.83% | 38.16% | 33.93% | 3.35% | -0.42% | 20.98% | 4.61% | 23.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCCQ.TO and WXM.TO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2019 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, FCCQ.TO and WXM.TO have become more correlated (0.79) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.
FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCCQ.TO
WXM.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FCCQ.TO
WXM.TO
Basic Materials
FCCQ.TO
WXM.TO
Technology
FCCQ.TO
WXM.TO
Energy
FCCQ.TO
WXM.TO
Consumer Defensive
FCCQ.TO
WXM.TO
Consumer Cyclical
FCCQ.TO
WXM.TO
Healthcare
FCCQ.TO
WXM.TO
-
Industrials
FCCQ.TO
WXM.TO
Real Estate
FCCQ.TO
WXM.TO
-
Communication Services
FCCQ.TO
-
WXM.TO
Utilities
FCCQ.TO
-
WXM.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FCCQ.TO
WXM.TO
FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCCQ.TO | WXM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.55 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 4.90 | -2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.87 | 21.82 | -9.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCCQ.TO | WXM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 3.10 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 1.18 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.91 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCCQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, smaller than the maximum WXM.TO drawdown of -40.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCQ.TO and WXM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCCQ.TO | WXM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.31% | -40.45% | +5.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | -9.49% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -12.13% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.97% | -15.87% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -0.33% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -4.48% | +0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 2.13% | +0.51% |
Volatility
FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO) have volatilities of 4.12% and 4.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCCQ.TO | WXM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 4.06% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 11.86% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.47% | 15.02% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 15.85% | -2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 16.78% | -0.73% |
FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCCQ.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WXM.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCCQ.TO vs. WXM.TO - Dividend Comparison
FCCQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than WXM.TO's 1.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF | 1.47% | 1.45% | 1.83% | 2.40% | 2.31% | 1.90% | 2.10% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF | 1.15% | 1.25% | 1.27% | 1.38% | 2.25% | 1.04% | 0.78% | 0.94% | 1.44% | 1.38% | 1.58% | 1.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCCQ.TO and WXM.TO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCCQ.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCCQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WXM.TO.
FCCQ.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while WXM.TO is Momentum. FCCQ.TO tracks Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality Index, while WXM.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Target Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and CI Global Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FCCQ.TO and 0.65% for WXM.TO.
Find the right allocation for FCCQ.TO and WXM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer