FCCQ.TO vs. FCIN.NEO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FCCQ.TO (Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF) and FCIN.NEO (Fidelity All-International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCCQ.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality Index, while FCIN.NEO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. FCCQ.TO is passively managed, while FCIN.NEO is actively managed. Over the past year, FCCQ.TO returned 29.90% vs 25.67% for FCIN.NEO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

FCCQ.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) and Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCCQ.TO achieves a 5.82% return, which is significantly lower than FCIN.NEO's 13.63% return.

FCCQ.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.29%
• YTD: 5.82%
• 6M: 4.72%
• 1Y: 29.90%
• 3Y*: 23.35%
• 5Y*: 13.54%
• 10Y*: —

FCIN.NEO

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 13.63%
• 6M: 13.28%
• 1Y: 25.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCCQ.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF	5.82%	32.22%	21.68%
FCIN.NEO Fidelity All-International Equity ETF	13.63%	27.93%	11.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FCCQ.TO and FCIN.NEO is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2024	0.51

The correlation between FCCQ.TO and FCIN.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCCQ.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCCQ.TO	FCIN.NEO
Financial Services	28.1%	27.9%
Basic Materials	23.8%	2.9%
Technology	13.0%	11.0%
Energy	10.6%	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	10.4%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	8.0%
Healthcare	3.9%	3.5%
Industrials	3.6%	16.5%
Real Estate	1.7%	4.5%
Communication Services	-	8.3%
Utilities	-	5.3%

Return for Risk

FCCQ.TO vs. FCIN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCCQ.TO

FCCQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 67
FCCQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FCCQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FCCQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FCCQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FCCQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FCIN.NEO

FCIN.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 64
FCIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FCIN.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FCIN.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FCIN.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FCIN.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCCQ.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) and Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCCQ.TO	FCIN.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	1.85	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	2.59	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.34	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	2.70	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.90	10.49	+0.41

FCCQ.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCCQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the FCIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCCQ.TO and FCIN.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCCQ.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCCQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.56%, which is greater than FCIN.NEO's maximum drawdown of -12.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCQ.TO and FCIN.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCCQ.TO	FCIN.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.56%	-12.34%	-23.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.29%	-9.56%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.41%	-1.75%	-1.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-1.54%	-2.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	2.45%	+0.30%

Volatility

FCCQ.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) is 3.85%, while Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that FCCQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCIN.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCCQ.TO	FCIN.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	4.45%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.08%	11.95%	+0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.75%	13.93%	+0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.73%	14.36%	-0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.09%	14.36%	+1.73%

Dividends

FCCQ.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Dividend Comparison

FCCQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than FCIN.NEO's 1.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF	1.48%	1.44%	1.85%	2.41%	2.33%	1.92%	2.14%	2.33%
FCIN.NEO Fidelity All-International Equity ETF	1.12%	1.28%	1.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCCQ.TO and FCIN.NEO in my portfolio?

FCCQ.TO and FCIN.NEO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between FCCQ.TO and FCIN.NEO?

FCCQ.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while FCIN.NEO is Global Equities.