FCCQ.TO vs. CFOU.TO
FCCQ.TO (Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF) and CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCCQ.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality Index, while CFOU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCCQ.TO returned 13.37%/yr vs 28.45%/yr for CFOU.TO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCCQ.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for CFOU.TO.
Performance
FCCQ.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCCQ.TO achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than CFOU.TO's 23.22% return.
FCCQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 7.88%
- 1Y
- 31.20%
- 3Y*
- 22.31%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- —
CFOU.TO
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 9.71%
- YTD
- 23.22%
- 6M
- 34.47%
- 1Y
- 88.95%
- 3Y*
- 57.23%
- 5Y*
- 28.45%
- 10Y*
- 22.91%
FCCQ.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF | 6.62% | 31.01% | 21.58% | 11.02% | -7.52% | 22.24% | 2.30% | 10.49% |
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 23.22% | 69.17% | 56.15% | 18.37% | -23.64% | 79.61% | -14.70% | 22.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCCQ.TO and CFOU.TO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2019 | 0.52 |
The correlation between FCCQ.TO and CFOU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.66 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FCCQ.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCCQ.TO
CFOU.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
FCCQ.TO
CFOU.TO
Basic Materials
FCCQ.TO
CFOU.TO
-
Technology
FCCQ.TO
CFOU.TO
-
Energy
FCCQ.TO
CFOU.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
FCCQ.TO
CFOU.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
FCCQ.TO
CFOU.TO
-
Healthcare
FCCQ.TO
CFOU.TO
-
Industrials
FCCQ.TO
CFOU.TO
-
Real Estate
FCCQ.TO
CFOU.TO
-
Communication Services
FCCQ.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Utilities
FCCQ.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCCQ.TO vs. CFOU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FCCQ.TO
CFOU.TO
FCCQ.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCCQ.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.57 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 5.56 | -2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.87 | 22.74 | -10.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCCQ.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 3.62 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 1.04 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.33 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
FCCQ.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCCQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, smaller than the maximum CFOU.TO drawdown of -86.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCQ.TO and CFOU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCCQ.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.31% | -86.23% | +50.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | -16.08% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -24.95% | +11.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.97% | -45.23% | +27.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -3.23% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -22.46% | +18.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 3.93% | -1.29% |
Volatility
FCCQ.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) is 4.12%, while BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that FCCQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFOU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCCQ.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 8.18% | -4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 20.93% | -8.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.47% | 24.70% | -10.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 27.56% | -13.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 33.85% | -17.80% |
FCCQ.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCCQ.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CFOU.TO's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCCQ.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Dividend Comparison
FCCQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF | 1.47% | 1.45% | 1.83% | 2.40% | 2.31% | 1.90% | 2.10% | 2.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCCQ.TO and CFOU.TO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCCQ.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCCQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
FCCQ.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while CFOU.TO is Leveraged Equities. FCCQ.TO tracks Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality Index, while CFOU.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FCCQ.TO and 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
Find the right allocation for FCCQ.TO and CFOU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer