FCCGX vs. VRTGX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FCCGX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class C) and VRTGX (Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FCCGX returned 13.50%/yr vs 11.44%/yr for VRTGX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FCCGX charges 2.05%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VRTGX.

Performance

FCCGX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class C (FCCGX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FCCGX having a 18.70% return and VRTGX slightly lower at 18.61%. Over the past 10 years, FCCGX has outperformed VRTGX with an annualized return of 13.50%, while VRTGX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.44% annualized return.

FCCGX

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: 18.70%
• 6M: 15.53%
• 1Y: 37.00%
• 3Y*: 20.01%
• 5Y*: 7.17%
• 10Y*: 13.50%

VRTGX

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: 18.61%
• 6M: 16.09%
• 1Y: 39.67%
• 3Y*: 19.22%
• 5Y*: 6.03%
• 10Y*: 11.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCCGX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCCGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class C	18.70%	10.01%	19.28%	17.84%	-26.11%	9.29%	35.00%	34.94%	-5.56%	27.60%
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	18.61%	12.97%	15.26%	18.80%	-26.30%	2.82%	34.81%	28.84%	-9.21%	22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FCCGX and VRTGX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010	0.97

The correlation between FCCGX and VRTGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCCGX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCCGX

FCCGX Risk / Return Rank: 45
FCCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FCCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FCCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FCCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FCCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

VRTGX

VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCCGX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class C (FCCGX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCCGX	VRTGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.86	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	2.56	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.30	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	2.69	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.25	9.68	+1.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCCGX vs. VRTGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the VRTGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCCGX and VRTGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCCGX	VRTGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	1.86	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.25	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.47	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.52	-0.05

Drawdowns

FCCGX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCCGX drawdown since its inception was -61.43%, which is greater than VRTGX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCGX and VRTGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCCGX	VRTGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.43%	-41.97%	-19.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.30%	-14.80%	+1.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.93%	-28.54%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.42%	-40.48%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.42%	-41.97%	+2.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.91%	-10.43%	-1.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	4.10%	-0.79%

Volatility

FCCGX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class C (FCCGX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) have volatilities of 6.23% and 6.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCCGX	VRTGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.23%	6.51%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.23%	15.87%	+0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.21%	21.41%	-0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.48%	24.56%	-1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.84%	24.51%	-1.67%

FCCGX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCCGX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCCGX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison

FCCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%, more than VRTGX's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCCGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class C	7.45%	8.84%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	24.00%	9.80%	6.42%	16.17%	7.56%	0.87%	4.12%
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	0.60%	0.57%	0.62%	0.85%	0.78%	0.54%	0.53%	0.90%	0.85%	0.75%	1.07%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCCGX and VRTGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FCCGX and VRTGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCCGX or VRTGX?

VRTGX has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to FCCGX (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCCGX dropped -61.43% vs VRTGX's -41.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.