PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCBFX vs. PRPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCBFX vs. PRPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX) and T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund (PRPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCBFX achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly higher than PRPIX's -1.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FCBFX has underperformed PRPIX with an annualized return of 2.33%, while PRPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.82% annualized return.


FCBFX

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.69%
6M
-1.24%
YTD
-0.99%
1Y
1.61%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
-0.46%
10Y*
2.33%
ALL TIME*
3.79%

PRPIX

1D
0.13%
1M
-1.87%
6M
-1.11%
YTD
-1.08%
1Y
1.62%
3Y*
6.94%
5Y*
1.00%
10Y*
2.82%
ALL TIME*
4.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCBFX vs. PRPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCBFX
Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund
-0.99%7.86%2.82%8.82%-17.11%-1.59%10.59%14.48%-2.56%6.83%
PRPIX
T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund
-1.08%9.21%6.49%12.72%-17.71%-0.76%7.87%15.77%-3.05%6.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FCBFX and PRPIX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2010

0.95

The correlation between FCBFX and PRPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCBFX vs. PRPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCBFX
FCBFX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FCBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FCBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

PRPIX
PRPIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
PRPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PRPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCBFX vs. PRPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX) and T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund (PRPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCBFXPRPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.10

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

0.73

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.23

2.32

-0.09

FCBFX vs. PRPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCBFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is comparable to the PRPIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCBFX and PRPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCBFX vs. PRPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCBFX drawdown since its inception was -23.23%, roughly equal to the maximum PRPIX drawdown of -24.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBFX and PRPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCBFXPRPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.23%

-24.24%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-3.29%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.62%

-4.93%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.21%

-24.24%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.23%

-24.24%

+1.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-2.48%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-2.86%

-1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

1.03%

+0.16%

Volatility

FCBFX vs. PRPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX) is 1.10%, while T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund (PRPIX) has a volatility of 1.16%. This indicates that FCBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCBFXPRPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

1.16%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.31%

3.32%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.20%

4.24%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.69%

6.65%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.96%

6.05%

-0.09%

FCBFX vs. PRPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCBFX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than PRPIX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCBFX vs. PRPIX - Dividend Comparison

FCBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, less than PRPIX's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCBFX
Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund
3.98%4.11%3.95%3.74%2.53%2.82%3.19%3.28%3.65%3.16%3.55%3.01%
PRPIX
T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund
4.75%5.87%8.35%7.54%2.42%5.61%3.82%5.47%3.47%3.95%3.20%4.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCBFX and PRPIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRPIX has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to FCBFX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBFX dropped -23.23% vs PRPIX's -24.24%.

FCBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCBFX and PRPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer