FCAVX vs. FHMIX
FCAVX (Franklin California Tax-Free Income Fund Advisor Class) and FHMIX (Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FCAVX returned 1.07%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for FHMIX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCAVX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FHMIX.
Performance
FCAVX vs. FHMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCAVX achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than FHMIX's 1.11% return.
FCAVX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 7.81%
- 3Y*
- 4.49%
- 5Y*
- 1.07%
- 10Y*
- 2.37%
FHMIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 2.85%
- 3Y*
- 1.90%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- —
FCAVX vs. FHMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAVX Franklin California Tax-Free Income Fund Advisor Class | 2.23% | 4.38% | 3.08% | 6.22% | -10.12% | 1.19% |
FHMIX Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund | 1.11% | 3.09% | 1.19% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCAVX and FHMIX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021 | 0.16 |
The correlation between FCAVX and FHMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCAVX vs. FHMIX — Risk / Return Rank
FCAVX
FHMIX
FCAVX vs. FHMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin California Tax-Free Income Fund Advisor Class (FCAVX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCAVX | FHMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 5.69 | -4.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 28.50 | -25.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.65 | 77.58 | -68.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCAVX vs. FHMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCAVX drawdown since its inception was -16.05%, which is greater than FHMIX's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAVX and FHMIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCAVX | FHMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.05% | -0.50% | -15.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | -0.10% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.46% | -0.50% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.05% | -0.50% | -15.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | 0.00% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.35% | -0.06% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.04% | +0.86% |
Volatility
FCAVX vs. FHMIX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin California Tax-Free Income Fund Advisor Class (FCAVX) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX) at 0.21%. This indicates that FCAVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCAVX | FHMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.94% | 0.21% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.43% | 0.56% | +1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19% | 0.89% | +2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.61% | 0.79% | +3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.83% | 0.78% | +4.05% |
FCAVX vs. FHMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCAVX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FHMIX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCAVX vs. FHMIX - Dividend Comparison
FCAVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than FHMIX's 2.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAVX Franklin California Tax-Free Income Fund Advisor Class | 3.86% | 5.10% | 4.36% | 3.31% | 3.41% | 2.78% | 3.01% | 3.95% | 3.67% | 3.67% | 3.76% | 4.02% |
FHMIX Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund | 2.80% | 3.04% | 1.18% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCAVX and FHMIX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCAVX has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to FHMIX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAVX dropped -16.05% vs FHMIX's -0.50%.
FHMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCAVX and FHMIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer