PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCAKX vs. TILIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCAKX vs. TILIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund Class K (FCAKX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCAKX achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than TILIX's 8.58% return. Over the past 10 years, FCAKX has underperformed TILIX with an annualized return of 16.47%, while TILIX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.64% annualized return.


FCAKX

1D
-0.15%
1M
5.65%
YTD
16.85%
6M
17.47%
1Y
34.56%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
14.68%
10Y*
16.47%

TILIX

1D
-0.37%
1M
7.10%
YTD
8.58%
6M
7.86%
1Y
27.30%
3Y*
25.49%
5Y*
16.00%
10Y*
18.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCAKX vs. TILIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCAKX
Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund Class K
16.85%18.12%25.19%28.92%-21.17%23.95%34.02%30.30%-5.15%22.81%
TILIX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
8.58%18.41%33.31%42.64%-29.22%27.63%38.43%36.30%-1.66%28.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAKX and TILIX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2008

0.94

The correlation between FCAKX and TILIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCAKX vs. TILIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAKX
FCAKX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FCAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FCAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

TILIX
TILIX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TILIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TILIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCAKX vs. TILIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund Class K (FCAKX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCAKXTILIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.47

1.84

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.25

2.50

+0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.32

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

1.75

+1.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.89

5.84

+8.05

FCAKX vs. TILIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the TILIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAKX and TILIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCAKXTILIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.84

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.75

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.89

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.61

-0.04

Drawdowns

FCAKX vs. TILIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAKX drawdown since its inception was -52.42%, roughly equal to the maximum TILIX drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAKX and TILIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCAKXTILIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.42%

-50.54%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-16.24%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.60%

-23.33%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.60%

-32.68%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.06%

-32.68%

-0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.37%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-7.73%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

4.84%

-2.28%

Volatility

FCAKX vs. TILIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund Class K (FCAKX) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX) at 3.32%. This indicates that FCAKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCAKXTILIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

3.32%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.32%

11.60%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.50%

15.42%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.90%

21.47%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

21.09%

-0.50%

FCAKX vs. TILIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAKX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than TILIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCAKX vs. TILIX - Dividend Comparison

FCAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, more than TILIX's 4.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCAKX
Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund Class K
6.84%7.99%18.24%3.39%9.36%16.79%8.41%13.55%13.38%10.41%5.73%12.36%
TILIX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
4.06%4.41%3.25%1.90%11.00%8.76%1.91%2.38%4.01%0.68%1.33%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCAKX and TILIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCAKX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to TILIX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAKX dropped -52.42% vs TILIX's -50.54%.

FCAKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCAKX and TILIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer