FBYY vs. TSDD
FBYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions. FBYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSDD.
Performance
FBYY vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBYY achieves a -25.13% return, which is significantly lower than TSDD's -1.29% return.
FBYY
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- 6M
- -23.88%
- YTD
- -25.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD
- 1D
- 6.42%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- 6M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- -1.29%
- 1Y
- -63.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBYY vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FBYY GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF | -25.13% | -11.29% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | -1.29% | -10.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBYY and TSDD is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | -0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBYY vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank
FBYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSDD
FBYY vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF (FBYY) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBYY | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.90 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.91 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBYY vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBYY drawdown since its inception was -37.71%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBYY and TSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBYY | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.71% | -99.03% | +61.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -69.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.63% | -98.87% | +62.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.64% | -72.11% | +47.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 54.62% | — |
Volatility
FBYY vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBYY | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 35.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 63.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.65% | 89.62% | -65.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.65% | 114.67% | -91.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.65% | 114.67% | -91.02% |
FBYY vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TSDD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBYY vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison
FBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.57%, more than TSDD's 8.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBYY GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF | 48.57% | 10.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 8.53% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBYY and TSDD have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FBYY.
FBYY has the higher dividend yield at 48.57%, compared with 8.53% for TSDD.
FBYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSDD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for FBYY and 0.95% for TSDD.
Find the right allocation for FBYY and TSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer