FBYY vs. TSDD
FBYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. FBYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for TSDD.
Performance
FBYY vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBYY achieves a -24.59% return, which is significantly lower than TSDD's 12.81% return.
FBYY
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- -24.59%
- 6M
- -24.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD
- 1D
- 11.65%
- 1M
- 18.16%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 31.20%
- 1Y
- -50.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBYY vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FBYY GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF | -24.59% | -11.29% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 12.81% | -10.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBYY and TSDD is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | -0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBYY vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank
FBYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSDD
FBYY vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF (FBYY) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBYY | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.95 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.69 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.89 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBYY vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBYY drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBYY and TSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBYY | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.17% | -99.03% | +62.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -72.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.17% | -98.71% | +62.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.70% | -71.62% | +47.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 56.48% | — |
Volatility
FBYY vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBYY | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 27.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 56.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.36% | 89.21% | -64.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.36% | 114.32% | -89.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.36% | 114.32% | -89.96% |
FBYY vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBYY vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison
FBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.70%, more than TSDD's 7.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBYY GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF | 45.70% | 10.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 7.47% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBYY and TSDD have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FBYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FBYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSDD.
FBYY has the higher dividend yield at 45.70%, compared with 7.47% for TSDD.
FBYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSDD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for FBYY and 1.50% for TSDD.
Find the right allocation for FBYY and TSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer