PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBYY vs. IVVW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBYY vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF (FBYY) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBYY achieves a -19.58% return, which is significantly lower than IVVW's 4.84% return.


FBYY

1D
2.04%
1M
4.40%
YTD
-19.58%
6M
-19.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVVW

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.90%
YTD
4.84%
6M
6.58%
1Y
20.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBYY vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FBYY
GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF
-19.58%-11.23%
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
4.84%3.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FBYY and IVVW is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBYY vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBYY

IVVW
IVVW Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IVVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVW Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVW Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBYY vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF (FBYY) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FBYY vs. IVVW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBYYIVVWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.71

1.07

-2.78

Drawdowns

FBYY vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBYY drawdown since its inception was -35.38%, which is greater than IVVW's maximum drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBYY and IVVW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBYYIVVWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.38%

-16.79%

-18.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.93%

-0.09%

-31.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.92%

-1.75%

-21.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

Volatility

FBYY vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBYYIVVWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.90%

7.40%

+17.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.90%

12.66%

+12.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.90%

12.66%

+12.24%

FBYY vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBYY vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison

FBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.44%, more than IVVW's 19.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FBYY
GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF
40.44%10.35%0.00%
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
19.70%18.55%13.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBYY and IVVW have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FBYY.

FBYY has the higher dividend yield at 40.44%, compared with 19.70% for IVVW.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for FBYY and 0.25% for IVVW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBYY and IVVW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer