FBUF vs. PQJA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) and PQJA (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBUF returned 19.61% vs 22.65% for PQJA. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FBUF charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQJA.

Performance

FBUF vs. PQJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January (PQJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBUF achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly lower than PQJA's 8.72% return.

FBUF

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.85%
• YTD: 5.32%
• 6M: 6.28%
• 1Y: 19.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PQJA

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 3.19%
• YTD: 8.72%
• 6M: 10.05%
• 1Y: 22.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBUF vs. PQJA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	5.32%	14.10%
PQJA PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January	8.72%	16.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FBUF and PQJA is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025	0.89

The correlation between FBUF and PQJA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBUF vs. PQJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBUF

FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 79
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

PQJA

PQJA Risk / Return Rank: 82
PQJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PQJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
PQJA Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PQJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PQJA Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBUF vs. PQJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January (PQJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBUF	PQJA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	2.77	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	3.93	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.55	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	3.36	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.68	16.33	-0.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBUF vs. PQJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBUF Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the PQJA Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBUF and PQJA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBUF	PQJA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	2.77	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.47	1.39	+0.08

Drawdowns

FBUF vs. PQJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBUF drawdown since its inception was -11.09%, smaller than the maximum PQJA drawdown of -14.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBUF and PQJA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBUF	PQJA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.09%	-14.72%	+3.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.61%	-6.77%	+1.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-0.09%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.38%	-1.65%	+0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.25%	1.39%	-0.14%

Volatility

FBUF vs. PQJA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) is 1.11%, while PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January (PQJA) has a volatility of 1.20%. This indicates that FBUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBUF	PQJA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.11%	1.20%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.37%	6.66%	-1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.49%	8.24%	-0.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.55%	13.42%	-3.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.55%	13.42%	-3.87%

FBUF vs. PQJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBUF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than PQJA's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBUF vs. PQJA - Dividend Comparison

FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while PQJA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	0.63%	0.64%	0.54%
PQJA PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBUF and PQJA in my portfolio?

FBUF and PQJA have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBUF or PQJA?

PQJA has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to FBUF (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBUF dropped -11.09% vs PQJA's -14.72%.

Which ETF is better, FBUF or PQJA?

On 1-year performance, PQJA leads with 22.65% vs 19.61% for FBUF. On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBUF or PQJA?

Over the 1-year period, PQJA has performed better with a 22.65% return vs 19.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBUF or PQJA?

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PQJA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBUF or PQJA?

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for PQJA.

What is the main difference between FBUF and PQJA?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for FBUF and 0.50% for PQJA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQJA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.