FBUF vs. CBOJ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) and CBOJ (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds. FBUF is actively managed, while CBOJ is passively managed. Over the past year, FBUF returned 16.49% vs -4.25% for CBOJ. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBUF charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOJ.

Performance

FBUF vs. CBOJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBUF achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly higher than CBOJ's -1.85% return.

FBUF

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -0.79%
• YTD: 3.62%
• 6M: 3.09%
• 1Y: 16.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBOJ

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: -1.85%
• 6M: -2.06%
• 1Y: -4.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBUF vs. CBOJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	3.62%	12.11%
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-1.85%	-0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FBUF and CBOJ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

FBUF vs. CBOJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBUF

FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 68
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 72

CBOJ

CBOJ Risk / Return Rank: 4
CBOJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CBOJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CBOJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CBOJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CBOJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBUF vs. CBOJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBUF	CBOJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	-0.87	+2.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	-1.17	+3.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	0.87	+0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	-0.52	+3.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.59	-0.80	+13.39

FBUF vs. CBOJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBUF Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the CBOJ Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBUF and CBOJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBUF vs. CBOJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBUF drawdown since its inception was -11.09%, which is greater than CBOJ's maximum drawdown of -8.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBUF and CBOJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBUF	CBOJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.09%	-8.15%	-2.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.61%	-8.15%	+2.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.83%	-8.15%	+6.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.38%	-3.30%	+1.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.31%	5.35%	-4.04%

Volatility

FBUF vs. CBOJ - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) at 0.85%. This indicates that FBUF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBOJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBUF	CBOJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.44%	0.85%	+2.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.11%	2.35%	+3.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.11%	4.90%	+3.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.69%	4.52%	+5.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.69%	4.52%	+5.17%

FBUF vs. CBOJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBUF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than CBOJ's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBUF vs. CBOJ - Dividend Comparison

FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than CBOJ's 3.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	3.22%	3.16%	0.00%
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBUF and CBOJ in my portfolio?

FBUF and CBOJ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBUF or CBOJ?

FBUF has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to CBOJ (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBUF dropped -11.09% vs CBOJ's -8.15%.

Which ETF is better, FBUF or CBOJ?

On 1-year performance, FBUF leads with 16.49% vs -4.25% for CBOJ. On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, CBOJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBUF or CBOJ?

Over the 1-year period, FBUF has performed better with a 16.49% return vs -4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBUF or CBOJ?

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBOJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBUF or CBOJ?

CBOJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.60% for FBUF.

What is the main difference between FBUF and CBOJ?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for FBUF and 0.69% for CBOJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBUF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.