PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBTU.L vs. SPAQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBTU.L vs. SPAQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) and Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBTU.L vs. SPAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FBTU.L
First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating
-5.44%25.95%4.74%-1.41%
SPAQ
Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF
0.06%7.35%4.33%5.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTU.L achieves a -5.44% return, which is significantly lower than SPAQ's 0.06% return.


FBTU.L

1D
2.87%
1M
-4.92%
YTD
-5.44%
6M
12.00%
1Y
18.72%
3Y*
8.81%
5Y*
3.92%
10Y*

SPAQ

1D
0.62%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
0.06%
6M
1.51%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBTU.L vs. SPAQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTU.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SPAQ's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FBTU.L vs. SPAQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTU.L
FBTU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FBTU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

SPAQ
SPAQ Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SPAQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPAQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPAQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SPAQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPAQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTU.L vs. SPAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) and Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBTU.LSPAQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

0.56

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

0.84

+0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.13

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

0.98

+0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.61

3.66

-0.05

FBTU.L vs. SPAQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the SPAQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTU.L and SPAQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBTU.LSPAQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

0.56

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.78

-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between FBTU.L and SPAQ is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FBTU.L vs. SPAQ - Dividend Comparison

FBTU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.68%.


Drawdowns

FBTU.L vs. SPAQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.73%, which is greater than SPAQ's maximum drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTU.L and SPAQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBTU.LSPAQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.73%

-5.30%

-28.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.22%

-5.30%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.52%

-1.97%

-9.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.30%

-0.53%

-12.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.00%

1.41%

+3.59%

Volatility

FBTU.L vs. SPAQ - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) at 1.75%. This indicates that FBTU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPAQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBTU.LSPAQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

1.75%

+5.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.90%

6.25%

+8.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.95%

8.60%

+14.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.73%

7.04%

+13.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.25%

7.04%

+14.21%