PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBTTX vs. FBTCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBTTX vs. FBTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C (FBTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FBTTX having a 13.78% return and FBTCX slightly lower at 13.55%. Over the past 10 years, FBTTX has outperformed FBTCX with an annualized return of 13.25%, while FBTCX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.01% annualized return.


FBTTX

1D
0.78%
1M
9.65%
YTD
13.78%
6M
10.44%
1Y
64.18%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
13.25%

FBTCX

1D
0.77%
1M
9.62%
YTD
13.55%
6M
10.18%
1Y
63.37%
3Y*
19.12%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
12.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTTX vs. FBTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBTTX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M
13.78%39.21%5.08%10.43%-8.22%-3.35%31.82%25.39%-4.19%25.37%
FBTCX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C
13.55%38.48%-2.00%9.86%-8.64%-3.72%31.17%24.82%-4.55%24.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTTX and FBTCX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2000

1.00

The correlation between FBTTX and FBTCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBTTX vs. FBTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTTX
FBTTX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FBTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTCX
FBTCX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FBTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTTX vs. FBTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C (FBTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBTTXFBTCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.43

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.16

6.99

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.68

19.16

+0.52

FBTTX vs. FBTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the FBTCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTTX and FBTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBTTX vs. FBTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTTX drawdown since its inception was -63.75%, roughly equal to the maximum FBTCX drawdown of -64.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTTX and FBTCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBTTXFBTCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.75%

-64.04%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-9.04%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.91%

-37.26%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.64%

-37.26%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

-39.37%

+0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.79%

-23.03%

+1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

3.29%

-0.04%

Volatility

FBTTX vs. FBTCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C (FBTCX) have volatilities of 9.18% and 9.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBTTXFBTCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.18%

9.21%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.93%

17.96%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.16%

23.19%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.68%

23.84%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.43%

24.50%

-0.07%

FBTTX vs. FBTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTTX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTCX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBTTX vs. FBTCX - Dividend Comparison

FBTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than FBTCX's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBTCX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C
1.48%1.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%24.50%9.78%7.92%2.92%0.00%0.00%5.73%
FBTTX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M
1.35%1.53%6.41%0.93%0.00%21.60%8.79%7.10%2.64%0.00%0.00%5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FBTTX and FBTCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FBTCX has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to FBTTX (9.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTTX dropped -63.75% vs FBTCX's -64.04%.

FBTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBTTX and FBTCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer