FBTCX vs. FBTTX
FBTCX (Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C) and FBTTX (Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FBTCX returned 11.92%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for FBTTX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FBTCX charges 1.75%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for FBTTX.
Performance
FBTCX vs. FBTTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FBTCX having a 12.68% return and FBTTX slightly higher at 12.90%. Over the past 10 years, FBTCX has underperformed FBTTX with an annualized return of 11.92%, while FBTTX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.16% annualized return.
FBTCX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 12.68%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- 1Y
- 61.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.92%
FBTTX
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 9.11%
- YTD
- 12.90%
- 6M
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 62.43%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.16%
FBTCX vs. FBTTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBTCX Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C | 12.68% | 38.48% | -2.00% | 9.86% | -8.64% | -3.72% | 31.17% | 24.82% | -4.55% | 24.81% |
FBTTX Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M | 12.90% | 39.21% | 5.08% | 10.43% | -8.22% | -3.35% | 31.82% | 25.39% | -4.19% | 25.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBTCX and FBTTX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2000 | 1.00 |
The correlation between FBTCX and FBTTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBTCX vs. FBTTX — Risk / Return Rank
FBTCX
FBTTX
FBTCX vs. FBTTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C (FBTCX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBTCX | FBTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.45 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.23 | 7.41 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.82 | 20.35 | -0.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBTCX vs. FBTTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBTCX drawdown since its inception was -64.04%, roughly equal to the maximum FBTTX drawdown of -63.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTCX and FBTTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBTCX | FBTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.04% | -63.75% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -8.94% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.26% | -32.91% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.26% | -36.64% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.37% | -39.04% | -0.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.04% | -21.79% | -1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 3.25% | +0.04% |
Volatility
FBTCX vs. FBTTX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C (FBTCX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX) have volatilities of 9.23% and 9.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBTCX | FBTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.23% | 9.21% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.03% | 18.00% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.20% | 23.17% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.84% | 23.68% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.51% | 24.43% | +0.08% |
FBTCX vs. FBTTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBTCX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTTX's 1.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBTCX vs. FBTTX - Dividend Comparison
FBTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than FBTTX's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBTCX Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class C | 1.49% | 1.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 24.50% | 9.78% | 7.92% | 2.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.73% |
FBTTX Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M | 1.36% | 1.53% | 6.41% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 21.60% | 8.79% | 7.10% | 2.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, FBTCX and FBTTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FBTCX has higher volatility (9.23%) compared to FBTTX (9.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTCX dropped -64.04% vs FBTTX's -63.75%.
FBTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBTCX and FBTTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer