PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBT.L vs. ZPDJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBT.L vs. ZPDJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Acc (FBT.L) and SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (ZPDJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FBT.L is traded in GBp, while ZPDJ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ZPDJ.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBT.L achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly lower than ZPDJ.DE's 16.29% return.


FBT.L

1D
1.98%
1M
8.09%
YTD
4.41%
6M
1.93%
1Y
34.35%
3Y*
9.80%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*

ZPDJ.DE

1D
0.89%
1M
7.49%
YTD
16.29%
6M
17.68%
1Y
34.08%
3Y*
15.93%
5Y*
10.29%
10Y*
10.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBT.L vs. ZPDJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FBT.L
First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Acc
4.41%17.24%7.13%-0.99%3.88%-2.57%-2.54%
ZPDJ.DE
SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF
16.29%18.46%8.79%14.19%-7.72%2.21%14.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FBT.L and ZPDJ.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2020

0.22

The correlation between FBT.L and ZPDJ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBT.L vs. ZPDJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBT.L
FBT.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FBT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FBT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPDJ.DE
ZPDJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ZPDJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBT.L vs. ZPDJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Acc (FBT.L) and SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (ZPDJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBT.LZPDJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.36

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

3.25

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.60

10.41

-3.81

FBT.L vs. ZPDJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the ZPDJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBT.L and ZPDJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBT.LZPDJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.85

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.64

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.58

-0.32

Drawdowns

FBT.L vs. ZPDJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBT.L drawdown since its inception was -30.39%, which is greater than ZPDJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBT.L and ZPDJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBT.LZPDJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.39%

-24.47%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.81%

-10.45%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.70%

-15.02%

-8.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.70%

-18.71%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

0.00%

-1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.45%

-5.11%

-8.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.19%

3.26%

+1.93%

Volatility

FBT.L vs. ZPDJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Acc (FBT.L) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (ZPDJ.DE) at 4.06%. This indicates that FBT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPDJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBT.LZPDJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

4.06%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.02%

14.72%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.11%

18.32%

+1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.49%

15.95%

+6.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.86%

16.21%

+7.65%

FBT.L vs. ZPDJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBT.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPDJ.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBT.L vs. ZPDJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBT.L nor ZPDJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FBT.L and ZPDJ.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPDJ.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FBT.L.

FBT.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while ZPDJ.DE is Japan Equities. FBT.L tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD, while ZPDJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FBT.L and 0.12% for ZPDJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBT.L and ZPDJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer