PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBNTX vs. FADMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBNTX vs. FADMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class M (FBNTX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBNTX achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than FADMX's 3.53% return.


FBNTX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.07%
6M
0.67%
YTD
0.67%
1Y
3.02%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
2.03%
10Y*

FADMX

1D
0.31%
1M
0.39%
6M
3.53%
YTD
3.53%
1Y
8.15%
3Y*
8.08%
5Y*
3.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBNTX vs. FADMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FBNTX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class M
0.67%5.14%4.62%4.72%-4.00%-1.08%3.60%3.98%1.46%
FADMX
Fidelity Strategic Income Fund
3.53%9.01%6.02%9.55%-11.84%3.46%6.72%11.06%-2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FBNTX and FADMX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2018

0.52

The correlation between FBNTX and FADMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBNTX vs. FADMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBNTX
FBNTX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FBNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FBNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FADMX
FADMX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FADMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FADMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FADMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FADMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FADMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBNTX vs. FADMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class M (FBNTX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBNTXFADMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.45

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.13

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.16

13.50

-5.34

FBNTX vs. FADMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBNTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the FADMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBNTX and FADMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBNTX vs. FADMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBNTX drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, smaller than the maximum FADMX drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBNTX and FADMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBNTXFADMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-15.98%

+9.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-2.62%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.29%

-3.99%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.40%

-15.98%

+9.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

0.00%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.01%

-3.04%

+2.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.61%

-0.25%

Volatility

FBNTX vs. FADMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class M (FBNTX) is 0.54%, while Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) has a volatility of 1.46%. This indicates that FBNTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FADMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBNTXFADMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

1.46%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.35%

3.15%

-1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87%

3.69%

-1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.17%

4.55%

-2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.82%

4.77%

-2.95%

FBNTX vs. FADMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBNTX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FADMX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBNTX vs. FADMX - Dividend Comparison

FBNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than FADMX's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FADMX
Fidelity Strategic Income Fund
4.29%4.33%4.16%4.31%2.91%4.23%3.82%4.34%2.74%0.00%0.00%
FBNTX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class M
3.95%4.05%3.79%2.53%0.67%0.87%2.51%1.92%1.54%1.06%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBNTX and FADMX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FADMX has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to FBNTX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBNTX dropped -6.64% vs FADMX's -15.98%.

FADMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBNTX and FADMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer