PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBNIX vs. FADMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBNIX vs. FADMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class I (FBNIX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBNIX achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than FADMX's 3.29% return.


FBNIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.68%
6M
1.00%
1Y
3.74%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
2.18%
10Y*

FADMX

1D
0.16%
1M
1.09%
YTD
3.29%
6M
3.71%
1Y
9.92%
3Y*
8.21%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBNIX vs. FADMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FBNIX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class I
0.68%5.36%4.85%4.91%-3.90%-0.97%3.76%4.15%1.48%
FADMX
Fidelity Strategic Income Fund
3.29%9.01%6.02%9.55%-11.84%3.46%6.72%11.06%-2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FBNIX and FADMX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2018

0.52

The correlation between FBNIX and FADMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBNIX vs. FADMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBNIX
FBNIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FBNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FBNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FADMX
FADMX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FADMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FADMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FADMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FADMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FADMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBNIX vs. FADMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class I (FBNIX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBNIXFADMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.62

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.91

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.14

17.16

-6.02

FBNIX vs. FADMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBNIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the FADMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBNIX and FADMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBNIXFADMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.93

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.74

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.86

+0.27

Drawdowns

FBNIX vs. FADMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBNIX drawdown since its inception was -6.47%, smaller than the maximum FADMX drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBNIX and FADMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBNIXFADMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.47%

-15.98%

+9.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-2.62%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.29%

-3.99%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.28%

-15.98%

+9.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

0.00%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.95%

-3.07%

+2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.60%

-0.26%

Volatility

FBNIX vs. FADMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class I (FBNIX) is 0.54%, while Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that FBNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FADMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBNIXFADMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

1.35%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.33%

2.90%

-1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89%

3.50%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.19%

4.51%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.84%

4.77%

-2.93%

FBNIX vs. FADMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBNIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FADMX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBNIX vs. FADMX - Dividend Comparison

FBNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, less than FADMX's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FADMX
Fidelity Strategic Income Fund
4.28%4.33%4.16%4.31%2.91%4.23%3.82%4.34%2.74%0.00%0.00%
FBNIX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class I
4.17%4.26%4.00%2.71%0.78%0.99%2.67%2.09%1.72%1.21%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBNIX and FADMX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FADMX has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to FBNIX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBNIX dropped -6.47% vs FADMX's -15.98%.

FADMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBNIX and FADMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer