FBND vs. FTTHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class M (FTTHX).
FBND is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 6, 2014. FTTHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 6, 2003.
Performance
FBND vs. FTTHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, FBND has underperformed FTTHX with an annualized return of 2.80%, while FTTHX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.31% annualized return.
FBND
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 4.30%
- 5Y*
- 1.05%
- 10Y*
- 2.80%
FTTHX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- -0.00%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 24.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.31%
FBND vs. FTTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.34% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
FTTHX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class M | -0.00% | 18.17% | 10.14% | 16.09% | -17.95% | 13.40% | 15.99% | 25.02% | -8.23% | 19.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBND and FTTHX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.
FBND vs. FTTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBND has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FTTHX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBND vs. FTTHX — Risk / Return Rank
FBND
FTTHX
FBND vs. FTTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class M (FTTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBND | FTTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 1.32 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 1.90 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.87 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | 7.92 | -2.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBND | FTTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.32 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.48 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.69 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.41 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
FBND vs. FTTHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBND drawdown since its inception was -17.25%, smaller than the maximum FTTHX drawdown of -54.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBND and FTTHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBND | FTTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.25% | -54.89% | +37.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.66% | -7.61% | +4.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.25% | -26.21% | +8.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.25% | -29.22% | +11.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -4.89% | +3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.38% | -7.57% | +4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 2.07% | -1.17% |
Volatility
FBND vs. FTTHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) is 1.68%, while Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class M (FTTHX) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that FBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBND | FTTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | 4.84% | -3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.62% | 7.45% | -4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.44% | 12.13% | -7.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.90% | 12.32% | -6.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.08% | 13.62% | -7.54% |
Dividends
FBND vs. FTTHX - Dividend Comparison
FBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than FTTHX's 7.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.72% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
FTTHX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class M | 7.24% | 7.24% | 3.07% | 1.32% | 9.80% | 9.34% | 5.96% | 7.02% | 11.72% | 4.09% | 4.55% | 2.50% |