PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBNAX vs. FYBTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBNAX vs. FYBTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class A (FBNAX) and Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund (FYBTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBNAX achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than FYBTX's 1.07% return.


FBNAX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.07%
6M
0.55%
YTD
0.55%
1Y
3.15%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
2.01%
10Y*

FYBTX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.16%
6M
1.07%
YTD
1.07%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*
2.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBNAX vs. FYBTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBNAX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class A
0.55%5.15%4.63%4.72%-4.00%-1.08%3.61%4.01%1.00%0.95%
FYBTX
Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund
1.07%5.72%5.13%6.08%-3.50%-0.54%3.99%5.07%1.66%1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FBNAX and FYBTX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2016

0.74

The correlation between FBNAX and FYBTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBNAX vs. FYBTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBNAX
FBNAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FBNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FBNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FYBTX
FYBTX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FYBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FYBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBNAX vs. FYBTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class A (FBNAX) and Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund (FYBTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBNAXFYBTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.54

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

3.28

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.56

13.14

-4.58

FBNAX vs. FYBTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the FYBTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBNAX and FYBTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBNAX vs. FYBTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBNAX drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, which is greater than FYBTX's maximum drawdown of -6.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBNAX and FYBTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBNAXFYBTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-6.00%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-1.19%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.29%

-1.19%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.40%

-6.00%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.20%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.01%

-0.71%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

0.30%

+0.05%

Volatility

FBNAX vs. FYBTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class A (FBNAX) has a higher volatility of 0.58% compared to Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund (FYBTX) at 0.47%. This indicates that FBNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYBTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBNAXFYBTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

0.47%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

1.37%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85%

1.87%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.15%

2.20%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.81%

1.92%

-0.11%

FBNAX vs. FYBTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBNAX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FYBTX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBNAX vs. FYBTX - Dividend Comparison

FBNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than FYBTX's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FBNAX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class A
3.96%4.06%3.79%2.53%0.67%0.87%2.52%1.94%1.58%1.07%0.41%
FYBTX
Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund
4.74%4.66%3.67%2.76%1.26%1.65%2.31%2.72%2.45%1.59%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBNAX and FYBTX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBNAX has higher volatility (0.58%) compared to FYBTX (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBNAX dropped -6.64% vs FYBTX's -6.00%.

FYBTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBNAX and FYBTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer