PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBDIX vs. GGHCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBDIX vs. GGHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund (FBDIX) and Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBDIX achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly higher than GGHCX's -7.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FBDIX has outperformed GGHCX with an annualized return of 9.81%, while GGHCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.18% annualized return.


FBDIX

1D
-4.72%
1M
-5.53%
YTD
0.59%
6M
1.88%
1Y
59.54%
3Y*
26.59%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*
9.81%

GGHCX

1D
-1.62%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
-7.49%
6M
-9.37%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*
6.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBDIX vs. GGHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBDIX
Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund
0.59%52.68%15.37%18.40%-12.65%-27.58%29.85%49.11%-15.77%18.83%
GGHCX
Invesco Health Care Fund
-7.49%15.48%3.96%3.05%-13.53%12.05%14.52%32.01%0.27%15.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FBDIX and GGHCX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 1997

0.77

The correlation between FBDIX and GGHCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBDIX vs. GGHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBDIX
FBDIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FBDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FBDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

GGHCX
GGHCX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GGHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GGHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBDIX vs. GGHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund (FBDIX) and Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBDIXGGHCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.69

0.46

+2.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.54

0.74

+2.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.08

+0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.76

0.44

+6.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.11

1.02

+22.09

FBDIX vs. GGHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBDIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the GGHCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBDIX and GGHCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBDIXGGHCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

0.46

+2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.15

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.36

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.57

-0.17

Drawdowns

FBDIX vs. GGHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBDIX drawdown since its inception was -71.44%, which is greater than GGHCX's maximum drawdown of -40.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBDIX and GGHCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBDIXGGHCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.44%

-40.23%

-31.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-13.53%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.22%

-16.86%

-7.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.83%

-25.37%

-21.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.67%

-29.34%

-24.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.18%

-11.85%

+2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.74%

-8.82%

-19.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

5.80%

-3.12%

Volatility

FBDIX vs. GGHCX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund (FBDIX) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX) at 4.40%. This indicates that FBDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBDIXGGHCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

4.40%

+4.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.92%

10.12%

+7.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.10%

13.09%

+10.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.75%

15.53%

+10.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.33%

17.45%

+8.88%

FBDIX vs. GGHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBDIX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than GGHCX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBDIX vs. GGHCX - Dividend Comparison

FBDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.75%, more than GGHCX's 6.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBDIX
Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund
10.75%10.81%19.53%0.00%0.13%0.98%14.50%18.77%3.72%2.39%4.57%8.42%
GGHCX
Invesco Health Care Fund
6.15%5.69%5.17%0.00%0.00%24.69%6.44%3.51%8.81%6.88%2.24%15.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBDIX and GGHCX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBDIX has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to GGHCX (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBDIX dropped -71.44% vs GGHCX's -40.23%.

FBDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBDIX and GGHCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer