PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBDC vs. TFNS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBDC vs. TFNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBDC achieves a -7.17% return, which is significantly lower than TFNS's -3.01% return.


FBDC

1D
2.59%
1M
-5.28%
YTD
-7.17%
6M
-8.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TFNS

1D
2.48%
1M
1.06%
YTD
-3.01%
6M
0.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBDC vs. TFNS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FBDC and TFNS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

0.51

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBDC vs. TFNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FBDC vs. TFNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBDCTFNSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.56

0.48

-1.04

Drawdowns

FBDC vs. TFNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBDC drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, which is greater than TFNS's maximum drawdown of -14.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBDC and TFNS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBDCTFNSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.60%

-14.00%

-6.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.10%

-5.72%

-9.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.16%

-3.83%

-6.33%

Volatility

FBDC vs. TFNS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBDCTFNSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.22%

15.22%

+3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.22%

15.22%

+3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.22%

15.22%

+3.00%

FBDC vs. TFNS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBDC has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TFNS's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBDC vs. TFNS - Dividend Comparison

FBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.23%, more than TFNS's 0.51% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FBDC and TFNS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TFNS is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TFNS is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.

FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.23%, compared with 0.51% for TFNS.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for FBDC and 0.44% for TFNS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBDC and TFNS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer